The question of the catholicity of the Ukrainian lands in international relations 1918 - 1919

Kryvoruchko Olexandr
{"title":"The question of the catholicity of the Ukrainian lands in international relations 1918 - 1919","authors":"Kryvoruchko Olexandr","doi":"10.31652/2411-2143-2019-28-25-29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article examines the preconditions and consequences of the unification of the Ukrainian People’s Republic and West Ukrainian People’s Republic a single state body through the prism of international relations during the period of formation of the bases of the Versailles-Washington system, analyzing the first steps towards the implementation of the Reunification Act of the Union and the reasons for the failure of the collegiality. It is noted that the political outcome of the end of the First World War had a decisive influence on the position of Ukrainian leaders. The Ukrainian people were forced to fight for their own state life in difficult foreign policy circumstances. For the course of historical processes in the territory of Great Ukraine, a decisive factor was the revolution and subsequent military actions in the territory of the former Russian Empire. The difficulties of Galicians were largely due to the fact that they were in the camp of the losers. In addition to the unique ethnic roots and common state life in the past, the Galician people with the Dnieper were more dissociated than united. Recent adversaries on the fronts of the world war, with political leaders, who, calling themselves socialist, often resisted the opposite views on the content of socialist transformations (to mention at least the differences in relation to the fundamental question of private property) and held divergent positions in defined the key directions of the foreign policy course (the \"Polish question\", relations with the Entente, the attitude towards Soviet power, etc.), and, finally, with different chances to achieve world recognition (\"14 points\" by W. Wilson), western and eastern Ukrainians and After joining the ZUNR with the UPR, they continued to live a separate life, and their governments pursued an independent policy. Unfortunately, this association was declarative. Therefore, it is not surprising that the association was so short-lived in time. Already on November 17, 1919, after the departure of the Government of the UPR from abroad, the state communication with the Directory was torn apart, and an entirely independent political course was conducted on the international arena, aimed at obtaining diplomatic recognition from the victorious countries Entente.","PeriodicalId":270874,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Papers of the Vinnytsia Mykhailo Kotsyiubynskyi State Pedagogical University. Series: History.","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Papers of the Vinnytsia Mykhailo Kotsyiubynskyi State Pedagogical University. Series: History.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31652/2411-2143-2019-28-25-29","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article examines the preconditions and consequences of the unification of the Ukrainian People’s Republic and West Ukrainian People’s Republic a single state body through the prism of international relations during the period of formation of the bases of the Versailles-Washington system, analyzing the first steps towards the implementation of the Reunification Act of the Union and the reasons for the failure of the collegiality. It is noted that the political outcome of the end of the First World War had a decisive influence on the position of Ukrainian leaders. The Ukrainian people were forced to fight for their own state life in difficult foreign policy circumstances. For the course of historical processes in the territory of Great Ukraine, a decisive factor was the revolution and subsequent military actions in the territory of the former Russian Empire. The difficulties of Galicians were largely due to the fact that they were in the camp of the losers. In addition to the unique ethnic roots and common state life in the past, the Galician people with the Dnieper were more dissociated than united. Recent adversaries on the fronts of the world war, with political leaders, who, calling themselves socialist, often resisted the opposite views on the content of socialist transformations (to mention at least the differences in relation to the fundamental question of private property) and held divergent positions in defined the key directions of the foreign policy course (the "Polish question", relations with the Entente, the attitude towards Soviet power, etc.), and, finally, with different chances to achieve world recognition ("14 points" by W. Wilson), western and eastern Ukrainians and After joining the ZUNR with the UPR, they continued to live a separate life, and their governments pursued an independent policy. Unfortunately, this association was declarative. Therefore, it is not surprising that the association was so short-lived in time. Already on November 17, 1919, after the departure of the Government of the UPR from abroad, the state communication with the Directory was torn apart, and an entirely independent political course was conducted on the international arena, aimed at obtaining diplomatic recognition from the victorious countries Entente.
乌克兰土地在国际关系中的普遍性问题(1918 - 1919)
本文从凡尔赛-华盛顿体系基础形成时期的国际关系角度,考察了乌克兰人民共和国和西乌克兰人民共和国统一为单一国家的先决条件和后果,分析了实施《联邦统一法案》的第一步以及合议制失败的原因。人们注意到,第一次世界大战结束的政治结果对乌克兰领导人的立场产生了决定性的影响。乌克兰人民被迫在艰难的外交政策环境下为自己的国家生活而战。对于大乌克兰领土的历史进程来说,一个决定性的因素是前俄罗斯帝国领土上的革命和随后的军事行动。加利西亚人的困难很大程度上是因为他们站在失败者的阵营里。除了过去独特的民族根源和共同的国家生活外,与第聂伯河的加利西亚人更多的是分离而不是团结。最近在世界大战前线的对手,其政治领导人,自称为社会主义者,经常抵制对社会主义改造的内容的相反观点(至少提到与私有财产的基本问题有关的分歧),并在确定外交政策路线的关键方向(“波兰问题”,与协约国的关系,对苏联政权的态度,等等)上持不同立场,最后,尽管获得世界承认的机会不同(威尔逊提出的“14点”),乌克兰西部和东部的人,以及在加入普遍定期审议后,他们继续过着独立的生活,他们的政府奉行独立的政策。不幸的是,这种关联是声明性的。因此,这种联系如此短暂也就不足为奇了。早在1919年11月17日,普遍定期审议政府离开国外后,与政府的国家沟通就已中断,在国际舞台上进行了完全独立的政治进程,旨在获得战胜国协约国的外交承认。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信