Reliability of Post-Mortem Computed Tomography in Measuring Foramen Magnum Dimensions

Grace Wong Yi-Li, P. S. Lai, Mohamad Helmee Mohd Noor, K. Chinna, M. Ibrahim
{"title":"Reliability of Post-Mortem Computed Tomography in Measuring Foramen Magnum Dimensions","authors":"Grace Wong Yi-Li, P. S. Lai, Mohamad Helmee Mohd Noor, K. Chinna, M. Ibrahim","doi":"10.5744/fa.2022.0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Reliability of foramen magnum dimensions using post-mortem computed tomography (PMCT) to obtain standardized measurements for biological profiling with interest in sexual dimorphism needs to be evaluated prior to a larger scale population-based study. Method: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study of 40 Malaysian adult decedent PMCT skulls. Standardized morphometric evaluation of two foramen magnum parameters, the foramen magnum anterior-posterior diameter (FMAPD) and transverse diameter (FMTD), were performed by three readers at two separate times. Statistical analysis included intraobserver and interobserver relative technical error of measurement (RTEM), coefficients of reliability (R), and t-test. Results: Error rates (RTEM) for FMAPD demonstrated intraobserver values of 3.65–3.84% (R = 0.73–0.75, substantial reliability) and interobserver values of 4.12–5.23% (R = 0.56–0.68, moderate to substantial reliability). Error rates (RTEM) for FMTD demonstrated intraobserver values between 4.52% and 5.00% (R = 0.57–0.70, moderate to substantial reliability) and interobserver values between 5.50% and 6.38% (R = 0.48–0.64, moderate to substantial reliability). Discussion: To improve precision of a population-based study, we recommend specialized operator training in the use of PMCT software, adequate sample size, clear landmark definitions, and consideration of population affinity as a confounder.","PeriodicalId":309775,"journal":{"name":"Forensic Anthropology","volume":"85 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5744/fa.2022.0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction: Reliability of foramen magnum dimensions using post-mortem computed tomography (PMCT) to obtain standardized measurements for biological profiling with interest in sexual dimorphism needs to be evaluated prior to a larger scale population-based study. Method: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study of 40 Malaysian adult decedent PMCT skulls. Standardized morphometric evaluation of two foramen magnum parameters, the foramen magnum anterior-posterior diameter (FMAPD) and transverse diameter (FMTD), were performed by three readers at two separate times. Statistical analysis included intraobserver and interobserver relative technical error of measurement (RTEM), coefficients of reliability (R), and t-test. Results: Error rates (RTEM) for FMAPD demonstrated intraobserver values of 3.65–3.84% (R = 0.73–0.75, substantial reliability) and interobserver values of 4.12–5.23% (R = 0.56–0.68, moderate to substantial reliability). Error rates (RTEM) for FMTD demonstrated intraobserver values between 4.52% and 5.00% (R = 0.57–0.70, moderate to substantial reliability) and interobserver values between 5.50% and 6.38% (R = 0.48–0.64, moderate to substantial reliability). Discussion: To improve precision of a population-based study, we recommend specialized operator training in the use of PMCT software, adequate sample size, clear landmark definitions, and consideration of population affinity as a confounder.
死后计算机断层扫描测量枕骨大孔尺寸的可靠性
引言:在进行更大规模的基于人群的研究之前,需要评估使用死后计算机断层扫描(PMCT)获得的枕骨大孔尺寸的可靠性,以获得对两性异形感兴趣的生物学分析的标准化测量。方法:对40例马来西亚成年死者PMCT颅骨进行回顾性横断面研究。三名读卡器分别在两个时间对枕骨大孔前后直径(FMAPD)和横径(FMTD)两个参数进行标准化形态计量学评价。统计分析包括观察者内部和观察者之间的相对技术测量误差(RTEM)、信度系数(R)和t检验。结果:FMAPD的误差率(RTEM)显示观察者内值为3.65 ~ 3.84% (R = 0.73 ~ 0.75,信度较高),观察者间值为4.12 ~ 5.23% (R = 0.56 ~ 0.68,信度中等至信度较高)。FMTD的误差率(RTEM)在观察者内值为4.52% ~ 5.00% (R = 0.57 ~ 0.70,中信度至高信度),观察者间值为5.50% ~ 6.38% (R = 0.48 ~ 0.64,中信度至高信度)。讨论:为了提高以人群为基础的研究的准确性,我们建议对操作员进行PMCT软件使用方面的专门培训,适当的样本量,明确的里程碑定义,并考虑群体亲和力作为混杂因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信