Powerful Looks in Tamburlaine

R. Snyder
{"title":"Powerful Looks in Tamburlaine","authors":"R. Snyder","doi":"10.7190/jms.v2i0.123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several discussions of Tamburlaine have touched on the striking visual dimension of Marlowe's bombastic play—especially with regard to the theatricality of the titular conqueror himself, who, as David Thurn puts it, “steadfastly refuses to relinquish the power of sight.” At the same time, Tamburlaine has been put forth by scholars such as Joseph Khoury as a Machiavellian figure who embodies will-to-power without much impediment. While the larger-than-life Tamburlaine may seem in such readings a force unto himself, spinning victory out of an ultimately hollow rhetorical prowess and superior will, this article argues to the contrary that all major characters in the play, including Tamburlaine himself, operate within the same framework of princely glory as power. The play suggests, in other words, that looking the part and being the part of Machiavelli’s prince are not only directly entangled, but may be one in the same. Paying attention to the language of \"looks\" and looking within the play, the article thus situates Tamburlaine's visual rhetoric within this larger visual framework in order to argue that the secret of his success at conquest may be found not in a superior will but in the Machiavel's superior understanding of glory and how to manipulate it.","PeriodicalId":182286,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Marlowe Studies","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Marlowe Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7190/jms.v2i0.123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Several discussions of Tamburlaine have touched on the striking visual dimension of Marlowe's bombastic play—especially with regard to the theatricality of the titular conqueror himself, who, as David Thurn puts it, “steadfastly refuses to relinquish the power of sight.” At the same time, Tamburlaine has been put forth by scholars such as Joseph Khoury as a Machiavellian figure who embodies will-to-power without much impediment. While the larger-than-life Tamburlaine may seem in such readings a force unto himself, spinning victory out of an ultimately hollow rhetorical prowess and superior will, this article argues to the contrary that all major characters in the play, including Tamburlaine himself, operate within the same framework of princely glory as power. The play suggests, in other words, that looking the part and being the part of Machiavelli’s prince are not only directly entangled, but may be one in the same. Paying attention to the language of "looks" and looking within the play, the article thus situates Tamburlaine's visual rhetoric within this larger visual framework in order to argue that the secret of his success at conquest may be found not in a superior will but in the Machiavel's superior understanding of glory and how to manipulate it.
坦伯兰的强大外表
关于《坦伯兰》的几次讨论都触及了马洛这部浮夸的戏剧中引人注目的视觉维度——尤其是关于这位名义上的征服者本人的戏剧性,正如大卫·图恩所说,他“坚定地拒绝放弃视觉的力量”。与此同时,约瑟夫·库利(Joseph Khoury)等学者将坦伯兰(Tamburlaine)描述为一个马基雅维利式的人物,他毫无阻碍地体现了权力意志。虽然在这样的解读中,具有历史意义的帖木儿似乎是一股自成体系的力量,从空洞的修辞技巧和崇高的意志中获得胜利,但本文却相反地认为,剧中的所有主要人物,包括帖木儿本人,都是在同样的框架下运作的,即王公荣耀和权力。换句话说,这出戏表明,扮演马基雅维利的君主和成为君主不仅直接纠缠在一起,而且可能是同一件事。通过关注“外表”的语言和对戏剧的审视,文章将帖木叶的视觉修辞置于这个更大的视觉框架中,以论证他成功征服的秘密可能不在于优越的意志,而在于马基雅维利对荣耀的优越理解以及如何操纵它。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信