{"title":"USER ACCEPTANCE OF DATA INFORMED DECISION MAKING PORTALS: APPLICATION OF THE UTAUT MODEL AND LEADERSHIP STYLES","authors":"J. Marzal, Rizqa Raaiqa Bintana, P. E. P. Utomo","doi":"10.22437/jbsmr.v5i1.17052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In general, to make decisions in the discipline of information systems are divided into two, namely Decision Support System (DSS) and Data Informed Decision Making (DIDM). DIDM is a data-driven decision-making process taking into account previous experience, user research, and other important information. Many applications are categorized as data-informed for universities, one of which is a portal that contains data or information about various aspects of a university. There are not many known factors that influence leaders to use informed data as a tool for making decisions. This study applies the UTAUT (Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology) model by adding a leadership style variable as a moderating variable. Hypothesis testing using the bootstrapping technique in this study involved a number of samples (N) of 300, testing for the two-tailed hypothesis, using a significance level of 5%. Based on the test results revealed only facilitating conditions that affect use behavior. Meanwhile, the variables of performance expectancy, effort expectancy, and social influence have no effect on behavioral intention to use the application. In addition, it was also found that the moderator variable of leadership style did not affect the relationship between performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, and facilitating conditions with the intention and actual use of leaders in data informed applications to make decisions.","PeriodicalId":357539,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF BUSINESS STUDIES AND MANGEMENT REVIEW","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF BUSINESS STUDIES AND MANGEMENT REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22437/jbsmr.v5i1.17052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In general, to make decisions in the discipline of information systems are divided into two, namely Decision Support System (DSS) and Data Informed Decision Making (DIDM). DIDM is a data-driven decision-making process taking into account previous experience, user research, and other important information. Many applications are categorized as data-informed for universities, one of which is a portal that contains data or information about various aspects of a university. There are not many known factors that influence leaders to use informed data as a tool for making decisions. This study applies the UTAUT (Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology) model by adding a leadership style variable as a moderating variable. Hypothesis testing using the bootstrapping technique in this study involved a number of samples (N) of 300, testing for the two-tailed hypothesis, using a significance level of 5%. Based on the test results revealed only facilitating conditions that affect use behavior. Meanwhile, the variables of performance expectancy, effort expectancy, and social influence have no effect on behavioral intention to use the application. In addition, it was also found that the moderator variable of leadership style did not affect the relationship between performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, and facilitating conditions with the intention and actual use of leaders in data informed applications to make decisions.
一般来说,在信息系统中进行决策的学科分为两个,即决策支持系统(DSS)和数据知情决策(DIDM)。DIDM是一个数据驱动的决策过程,它考虑了以前的经验、用户研究和其他重要信息。许多应用程序被归类为大学的数据通知型应用程序,其中之一是包含有关大学各个方面的数据或信息的门户。影响领导者使用知情数据作为决策工具的已知因素并不多。本研究采用UTAUT (Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology)模型,加入领导风格变量作为调节变量。本研究中使用自举技术进行假设检验,涉及300个样本(N),双尾假设检验,显著性水平为5%。根据测试结果显示,只有便利条件才会影响使用行为。同时,绩效期望、努力期望和社会影响变量对应用程序的行为意图没有影响。此外,我们还发现,领导风格的调节变量不影响绩效期望、努力期望、社会影响力和促进条件与领导者在数据知情应用中的决策意图和实际使用之间的关系。