A Comparison of Type IV Hypersensitivity Reaction to Synthetic Polyisoprene Gloves versus Control Gloves Using Modified Draize-95 Test in Normal Individual
{"title":"A Comparison of Type IV Hypersensitivity Reaction to Synthetic Polyisoprene Gloves versus Control Gloves Using Modified Draize-95 Test in Normal Individual","authors":"","doi":"10.33976/iugns.31.2/2023/1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The emergence of epidemics in recent years, such as COVID-19 and monkeypox, has increased the need for protective gloves.\n\nObjectives: This study was performed to provide clinical evidence that no residual chemical additives are present in the powder-free, non-latex, with and without pigment, sterile and non-sterile nitrile, and polyisoprene gloves at a level that may induce type IV allergy in the unsensitized general user population.\n\nMethods and Materials: We conducted the modified Draize-95 test on the GAMMEX® Non-Latex PI, sterile powder-free synthetic polyisoprene surgical gloves (S01) and the GAMMEX® Non-Latex PI Green, sterile powder free synthetic polyisoprene surgical gloves (S02). A quasi-experimental non-equivalent study consisted of 180 healthy unsensitized adult volunteers at the Islamic University of Gaza. Participants were divided into two groups: 150 white subjects and 30 black subjects. Each group divided into two groups, each one contained approximately the same numbers of males and females. We used two sets of different test materials as 2x2 cm pieces of the glove's materials from the inner and outer surfaces mounted on an adhesive patch. For the control groups, we used Nitrile Skin Examination Powder-Free Disposable Gloves (C1) and Aegis Examination Gloves (C2).\n\nResults: None of the participants showed positive reactions to the test materials of equal or greater than 1.5 in the challenge or rechallenge phase, both on the inner and outer surfaces of the GAMMEX® Non-Latex PI, sterile powder-free synthetic polyisoprene surgical gloves (S01), and the GAMMEX® Non-Latex PI Green, sterile powder-free synthetic polyisoprene surgical gloves (S02). Only one white woman showed a reaction to the inner surface of the S02 material in the induction phase.\n\nThree participants showed skin reactions to the second control material, the Aegis Nitrile Examination Gloves (C2). Those three were a white female in the induction phase and two white males in the challenge phase. However, none of them showed any reaction later. \n\nConclusion: The modified Draize test negative results for the GAMMEX Non-Latex PI, sterile powder-free, synthetic polyisoprene surgical gloves (white and green) support the claim that the chemical sensitization potential of these materials is low and that no residual chemical additives are present in these gloves at a level that could cause type IV hypersensitivity reactions.","PeriodicalId":440576,"journal":{"name":"IUG Journal of Natural Studies","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IUG Journal of Natural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33976/iugns.31.2/2023/1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The emergence of epidemics in recent years, such as COVID-19 and monkeypox, has increased the need for protective gloves.
Objectives: This study was performed to provide clinical evidence that no residual chemical additives are present in the powder-free, non-latex, with and without pigment, sterile and non-sterile nitrile, and polyisoprene gloves at a level that may induce type IV allergy in the unsensitized general user population.
Methods and Materials: We conducted the modified Draize-95 test on the GAMMEX® Non-Latex PI, sterile powder-free synthetic polyisoprene surgical gloves (S01) and the GAMMEX® Non-Latex PI Green, sterile powder free synthetic polyisoprene surgical gloves (S02). A quasi-experimental non-equivalent study consisted of 180 healthy unsensitized adult volunteers at the Islamic University of Gaza. Participants were divided into two groups: 150 white subjects and 30 black subjects. Each group divided into two groups, each one contained approximately the same numbers of males and females. We used two sets of different test materials as 2x2 cm pieces of the glove's materials from the inner and outer surfaces mounted on an adhesive patch. For the control groups, we used Nitrile Skin Examination Powder-Free Disposable Gloves (C1) and Aegis Examination Gloves (C2).
Results: None of the participants showed positive reactions to the test materials of equal or greater than 1.5 in the challenge or rechallenge phase, both on the inner and outer surfaces of the GAMMEX® Non-Latex PI, sterile powder-free synthetic polyisoprene surgical gloves (S01), and the GAMMEX® Non-Latex PI Green, sterile powder-free synthetic polyisoprene surgical gloves (S02). Only one white woman showed a reaction to the inner surface of the S02 material in the induction phase.
Three participants showed skin reactions to the second control material, the Aegis Nitrile Examination Gloves (C2). Those three were a white female in the induction phase and two white males in the challenge phase. However, none of them showed any reaction later.
Conclusion: The modified Draize test negative results for the GAMMEX Non-Latex PI, sterile powder-free, synthetic polyisoprene surgical gloves (white and green) support the claim that the chemical sensitization potential of these materials is low and that no residual chemical additives are present in these gloves at a level that could cause type IV hypersensitivity reactions.
背景:近年来COVID-19和猴痘等流行病的出现增加了对防护手套的需求。目的:本研究旨在提供临床证据,证明无粉末、非乳胶、含和不含色素、无菌和非无菌腈手套和聚异戊二烯手套中没有残留的化学添加剂,其水平可能在未致敏的普通用户人群中引起IV型过敏。方法和材料:我们对GAMMEX®Non-Latex PI无菌无粉末合成聚异戊二烯手术手套(S01)和GAMMEX®Non-Latex PI Green无菌无粉末合成聚异戊二烯手术手套(S02)进行改良Draize-95试验。一项准实验非等效研究由加沙伊斯兰大学的180名健康未敏感的成年志愿者组成。参与者被分成两组:150名白人和30名黑人。每一组被分成两组,每一组的男女人数大致相同。我们使用了两组不同的测试材料,分别将手套内外表面的2x2厘米的材料贴片安装在粘合剂上。对照组使用无丁腈皮肤检查一次性手套(C1)和Aegis检查手套(C2)。结果:在激发或再激发阶段,在GAMMEX®Non-Latex PI无菌无粉末合成聚异戊二烯手术手套(S01)和GAMMEX®Non-Latex PI Green无菌无粉末合成聚异戊二烯手术手套(S02)的内表面和外表面,没有参与者对等于或大于1.5的测试材料表现出阳性反应。在诱导阶段,只有一名白人女性对S02材料的内表面有反应。三名参与者对第二种对照材料Aegis丁腈检查手套(C2)表现出皮肤反应。这三个人是一个白人女性在诱导阶段,两个白人男性在挑战阶段。然而,后来他们都没有任何反应。结论:GAMMEX非乳胶PI、无菌无粉末、合成聚异戊二烯手术手套(白色和绿色)的改良Draize测试阴性结果支持了这些材料的化学致敏潜力低的说法,并且这些手套中没有残留的化学添加剂,其水平可能导致IV型超敏反应。