CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS AS A CRITICAL SOCIAL STUDY: NORMAN FAIRCLOUGH’S APPROACH

Milena Pešić
{"title":"CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS AS A CRITICAL SOCIAL STUDY: NORMAN FAIRCLOUGH’S APPROACH","authors":"Milena Pešić","doi":"10.22182/pr.7442022.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The initial thesis of this paper is that critical discourse analysis (CDA), as a qualitative, critical, explanatory approach in exploration of social communication, represents a valuable way of researching contemporary social/political communication, and an indispensable complement to traditional social scientific techniques, which privilege positivist paradigm, quantitative research in social/political communication examinations. Consequently, the main purpose of this paper is to point out what the uniqueness of CDA’s scientific contribution to the study of society consists of, through observing the specificity of the theoretical and methodological framework, categories and analytical procedures of CDA in Norman Fairclough’s approach. The introductory part of the article provides a summary overview of the starting points, notions and tenets of CDA. In the following section the focus is on the analytical review of the different levels of Norman Fairclough’s theoretical framework and methodological procedures of CDA. The third, final part of the article is an attempt to provide an overall view of the importance of CDA in Fairclough’s approach for critical social study.","PeriodicalId":411775,"journal":{"name":"Politička revija","volume":"104 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politička revija","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22182/pr.7442022.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The initial thesis of this paper is that critical discourse analysis (CDA), as a qualitative, critical, explanatory approach in exploration of social communication, represents a valuable way of researching contemporary social/political communication, and an indispensable complement to traditional social scientific techniques, which privilege positivist paradigm, quantitative research in social/political communication examinations. Consequently, the main purpose of this paper is to point out what the uniqueness of CDA’s scientific contribution to the study of society consists of, through observing the specificity of the theoretical and methodological framework, categories and analytical procedures of CDA in Norman Fairclough’s approach. The introductory part of the article provides a summary overview of the starting points, notions and tenets of CDA. In the following section the focus is on the analytical review of the different levels of Norman Fairclough’s theoretical framework and methodological procedures of CDA. The third, final part of the article is an attempt to provide an overall view of the importance of CDA in Fairclough’s approach for critical social study.
作为批判社会研究的批评话语分析:诺曼·费尔克拉夫的方法
本文的主要论点是,批判话语分析作为一种研究社会传播的定性、批判性和解释性方法,是研究当代社会/政治传播的一种有价值的方法,是对传统社会科学技术的不可缺少的补充,传统社会科学技术在社会/政治传播考试中有利于实证主义范式和定量研究。因此,本文的主要目的是通过观察Norman Fairclough方法中批评性话语分析的理论和方法框架、类别和分析过程的特殊性,指出批评性话语分析对社会研究的科学贡献的独特性在于什么。本文的引言部分概述了CDA的出发点、概念和原则。在下一节中,重点分析费尔克劳的批评性话语分析的理论框架和方法程序的不同层次。文章的第三部分,也就是最后一部分,试图对费尔克劳的批判性社会研究方法中批评性话语分析的重要性提供一个整体的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信