{"title":"Charles Kingsley","authors":"Andrew N. Mangham","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198850038.003.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter considers the conflict-laden work of Charles Kingsley. Kingsley was an avid follower of scientific developments. In 1842 he urged one of his correspondents to ‘study medicine [… I am studying it’. In the social novels Yeast (1848), Alton Locke (1850), and Two Years Ago (1857), we see the fruits of these labours, particularly in how the languages and methods of biology offer Kingsley a means of challenging views of starvation as an inevitable, necessary evil. In his portrayals of radical characters, Kingsley discusses how scientific ideas precluded the political appropriation of starvation as a means to beat the well-to-do. Famous for locking horns with John Henry Newman on the abstract question of what constitutes truth, Kingsley argues a case for seeing topics like the physiology of hunger not as a symbol of providentialist or radical thinking, but as the means of creating a more intelligent understanding of poverty.","PeriodicalId":261186,"journal":{"name":"The Science of Starving in Victorian Literature, Medicine, and Political Economy","volume":"176 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Science of Starving in Victorian Literature, Medicine, and Political Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198850038.003.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This chapter considers the conflict-laden work of Charles Kingsley. Kingsley was an avid follower of scientific developments. In 1842 he urged one of his correspondents to ‘study medicine [… I am studying it’. In the social novels Yeast (1848), Alton Locke (1850), and Two Years Ago (1857), we see the fruits of these labours, particularly in how the languages and methods of biology offer Kingsley a means of challenging views of starvation as an inevitable, necessary evil. In his portrayals of radical characters, Kingsley discusses how scientific ideas precluded the political appropriation of starvation as a means to beat the well-to-do. Famous for locking horns with John Henry Newman on the abstract question of what constitutes truth, Kingsley argues a case for seeing topics like the physiology of hunger not as a symbol of providentialist or radical thinking, but as the means of creating a more intelligent understanding of poverty.
本章探讨查尔斯·金斯利充满冲突的作品。金斯利是科学发展的热心追随者。1842年,他敦促他的一位通讯员“研究医学[…我正在研究医学]”。在社会小说《酵母》(1848)、《奥尔顿·洛克》(1850)和《两年前》(1857)中,我们看到了这些努力的成果,特别是在生物学的语言和方法如何为金斯利提供了一种挑战饥饿是不可避免的、必要的恶的观点的手段。在他对激进人物的描写中,金斯利讨论了科学思想如何排除了将饥饿作为打败富人的一种手段的政治挪用。金斯利因与约翰·亨利·纽曼(John Henry Newman)就什么是真理这一抽象问题展开争论而闻名,他认为,像饥饿生理学这样的话题不是天命主义或激进思想的象征,而是创造对贫困更明智理解的手段。