{"title":"Contracts as Reference Points: A Replication","authors":"Svenja Hippel, Sven Hoeppner","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3696458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract We replicate two treatments of an experimental theory test ( Fehr et al., 2011 ) studying Hart and Moore (2008) ’s idea that contracts serve as reference points in trading relationships. In contrast to rigid contracts, flexible contract terms may be perceived in a self-serving manner and, therefore, the contract parties might form subjective entitlements. This reference-dependent perception of flexible contract terms leads to a trade-off of the contractual form. While flexible contracts are, in theory, deemed preferable to rigid contracts, frustrated subjective entitlements may lead to perfunctory performance and shading behavior that is absent in rigid contracts. The results of our replication are mixed. Our findings imply further support for Hart and Moore (2008) ’s contracts as reference point hypothesis. However, our replication does not provide reliable evidence for the idea that competition creates objectivity and enhances perceived fairness of the contract terms.","PeriodicalId":322168,"journal":{"name":"Human Behavior & Game Theory eJournal","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Behavior & Game Theory eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3696458","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Abstract We replicate two treatments of an experimental theory test ( Fehr et al., 2011 ) studying Hart and Moore (2008) ’s idea that contracts serve as reference points in trading relationships. In contrast to rigid contracts, flexible contract terms may be perceived in a self-serving manner and, therefore, the contract parties might form subjective entitlements. This reference-dependent perception of flexible contract terms leads to a trade-off of the contractual form. While flexible contracts are, in theory, deemed preferable to rigid contracts, frustrated subjective entitlements may lead to perfunctory performance and shading behavior that is absent in rigid contracts. The results of our replication are mixed. Our findings imply further support for Hart and Moore (2008) ’s contracts as reference point hypothesis. However, our replication does not provide reliable evidence for the idea that competition creates objectivity and enhances perceived fairness of the contract terms.
我们复制了两种实验理论检验的处理方法(Fehr et al., 2011),研究了Hart和Moore(2008)关于契约作为贸易关系参考点的观点。与刚性合同相比,灵活的合同条款可能被认为是一种自私自利的方式,因此合同各方可能形成主观权利。这种对灵活合同条款的依赖参考的看法导致了合同形式的权衡。虽然从理论上讲,灵活合同被认为比刚性合同更可取,但受挫的主观权利可能导致敷衍的履行和模糊的行为,这在刚性合同中是不存在的。我们复制的结果喜忧参半。我们的研究结果进一步支持了Hart和Moore(2008)的契约作为参考点假说。然而,我们的复制并没有为竞争创造客观性和增强合同条款的感知公平性的观点提供可靠的证据。