Instrument Development to Improve Learning Process Assessment of Ear Nose Throat Specialist Education Program Student

D. Antono, J. Widodo, Trijoko Raharjo, W. Hardyanto
{"title":"Instrument Development to Improve Learning Process Assessment of Ear Nose Throat Specialist Education Program Student","authors":"D. Antono, J. Widodo, Trijoko Raharjo, W. Hardyanto","doi":"10.2991/assehr.k.211125.071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"---The need for ear, nose, throat – head and neck surgery specialists is still under ideal conditions. Until now, the number of these specialist doctors is around 1200, which so the ratio of doctors to a population of 1: 2000 is not ideal. The need for doctors is not comparable with the study period of medical / specialist students. This is a concern. The learning process that was followed turned out to be unable to measure the resulting learner performance. With this background, research needs to be carried out to reveal instruments capable of assessing the learning process of students. This research aims to describe the appropriate instrument to measure the student learning process. The study used a case study research design, with research subjects being doctor spesialist education program students. The results of the phase I research showed that 1) 64.4% of the students understood the learning competencies and indicators; 2) 49.3% of students thought the learning was not implemented as planned; 3) 87.4% of students think that the assessment process is only done by means of a check list. The results of the second phase of research showed that 1) 74.7% of students understood the learning competencies and indicators; 2) 66.3% of students thought the learning was not implemented as planned; 3) 54.8% of students think that the process assessment is only done by means of a check list. The average learning outcome for group II was higher than group I. Recommendations for related parties to be able to understand and be able to supervise and direct the development of instruments to improve the quality of learning.","PeriodicalId":448829,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Science, Education and Technology (ISET 2020)","volume":"181 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Science, Education and Technology (ISET 2020)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211125.071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

---The need for ear, nose, throat – head and neck surgery specialists is still under ideal conditions. Until now, the number of these specialist doctors is around 1200, which so the ratio of doctors to a population of 1: 2000 is not ideal. The need for doctors is not comparable with the study period of medical / specialist students. This is a concern. The learning process that was followed turned out to be unable to measure the resulting learner performance. With this background, research needs to be carried out to reveal instruments capable of assessing the learning process of students. This research aims to describe the appropriate instrument to measure the student learning process. The study used a case study research design, with research subjects being doctor spesialist education program students. The results of the phase I research showed that 1) 64.4% of the students understood the learning competencies and indicators; 2) 49.3% of students thought the learning was not implemented as planned; 3) 87.4% of students think that the assessment process is only done by means of a check list. The results of the second phase of research showed that 1) 74.7% of students understood the learning competencies and indicators; 2) 66.3% of students thought the learning was not implemented as planned; 3) 54.8% of students think that the process assessment is only done by means of a check list. The average learning outcome for group II was higher than group I. Recommendations for related parties to be able to understand and be able to supervise and direct the development of instruments to improve the quality of learning.
改进耳鼻喉专科教育项目学生学习过程评估的仪器开发
——对耳、鼻、喉、头颈外科专家的需求仍处于理想状态。到目前为止,这些专科医生的人数约为1200人,因此医生与人口的比例为1:2000并不理想。对医生的需求无法与医学/专科学生的学习时间相比较。这是一个问题。随后的学习过程被证明无法衡量最终的学习者表现。在此背景下,需要开展研究以揭示能够评估学生学习过程的工具。本研究旨在描述测量学生学习过程的适当工具。本研究采用个案研究设计,研究对象为博士专科教育专业的学生。第一阶段的研究结果表明:64.4%的学生理解了学习能力和学习指标;2) 49.3%的学生认为学习没有按计划进行;3) 87.4%的学生认为评估过程只是通过检查清单来完成的。第二阶段的研究结果表明:1)74.7%的学生了解学习能力和指标;2) 66.3%的学生认为学习没有按计划进行;3) 54.8%的学生认为过程评估只是通过检查清单的方式进行的。第二组的平均学习结果高于第一组。建议相关方能够理解并能够监督和指导工具的开发,以提高学习质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信