Legal Mechanism: Foreign Brand Claims Against Potentially Geographical Indications of Indonesia

Dara Quthni Effida Dara, Putri Kemala Sari Putri, Eza Aulia Eza, Asmaul Husna Nana
{"title":"Legal Mechanism: Foreign Brand Claims Against Potentially Geographical Indications of Indonesia","authors":"Dara Quthni Effida Dara, Putri Kemala Sari Putri, Eza Aulia Eza, Asmaul Husna Nana","doi":"10.33059/jhsk.v17i2.5135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"International community has recognized the superiority and quality of original Indonesian products, as a result, some native Indonesian products are claimed by foreigners as their trademarks, for example Gayo Arabica Coffee and Toraja Coffee. Indonesia in providing protection is a bit behind in seeing the potential of its own region. The research problem is to examine the juridical claims of foreign companies against products with potential Indonesian Geographical Indications, and the settlement mechanism based on Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications. Research method used is normative juridical with a statute approach. Claim of foreign companies against products with the potential for Indonesian Geographical Indications is the use of Intellectual Property Rights without rights, based on the MUI Fatwa decision, this is an injustice that is unlawful. The legal settlement mechanism for foreign brand claims against products with potential Indonesian Geographical Indications based on Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Marks and Geographical Indications is dependent on the violation of the claim, whether the party making the claim is in good faith or not. If at the time a sign is applied for registration as a Geographical Indication, a sign is used in good faith, the party can still use it for a period of two years, but if there is no good faith, it can take the mechanism of filing a lawsuit in the form of an application for compensation against the User of the Geographical Indication without rights. ","PeriodicalId":448059,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan","volume":"108 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33059/jhsk.v17i2.5135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

International community has recognized the superiority and quality of original Indonesian products, as a result, some native Indonesian products are claimed by foreigners as their trademarks, for example Gayo Arabica Coffee and Toraja Coffee. Indonesia in providing protection is a bit behind in seeing the potential of its own region. The research problem is to examine the juridical claims of foreign companies against products with potential Indonesian Geographical Indications, and the settlement mechanism based on Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications. Research method used is normative juridical with a statute approach. Claim of foreign companies against products with the potential for Indonesian Geographical Indications is the use of Intellectual Property Rights without rights, based on the MUI Fatwa decision, this is an injustice that is unlawful. The legal settlement mechanism for foreign brand claims against products with potential Indonesian Geographical Indications based on Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Marks and Geographical Indications is dependent on the violation of the claim, whether the party making the claim is in good faith or not. If at the time a sign is applied for registration as a Geographical Indication, a sign is used in good faith, the party can still use it for a period of two years, but if there is no good faith, it can take the mechanism of filing a lawsuit in the form of an application for compensation against the User of the Geographical Indication without rights. 
法律机制:针对印度尼西亚潜在地理标志的外国品牌索赔
国际社会已经认识到印尼原产产品的优越性和质量,因此,一些印尼本土产品被外国人声称为他们的商标,例如Gayo Arabica咖啡和Toraja咖啡。印尼在提供保护方面有点落后于看到自己地区的潜力。研究问题是审查外国公司对具有潜在印度尼西亚地理标志的产品的司法索赔,以及基于2016年第20号法律关于商标和地理标志的解决机制。研究方法采用规范法学与成文法相结合的方法。根据MUI Fatwa的决定,外国公司对具有印度尼西亚地理标志潜力的产品提出索赔是在没有权利的情况下使用知识产权,这是一种不公正的非法行为。根据2016年第20号《关于商标和地理标志的法律》,外国品牌对具有潜在印度尼西亚地理标志的产品提出索赔的法律解决机制取决于索赔的违反情况,以及索赔方是否出于善意。如果在申请地理标志注册时,该标志是善意使用的,当事人仍可以在两年的期限内使用该标志,但如果没有善意,则可以采取以申请赔偿的形式向无权利的地理标志使用人提起诉讼的机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信