Independent regulation of infrastructure services in India: a review

Gaurav Bhatiani
{"title":"Independent regulation of infrastructure services in India: a review","authors":"Gaurav Bhatiani","doi":"10.3233/IJR-120015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Economic liberalization policies in India, since 1991, have recognized market as an institution to achieve efficient resource allocation and appropriate pricing structures. The need for distancing the government from investment and consumption decisions has also been felt in infrastructure sectors. Demand–supply mismatch, natural monopoly segments, and social considerations in these sectors have, however, necessitated the need for regulatory institutions within a deregulated environment. Independent regulation was conceived as a second-best option capable of delivering results, which the market would have otherwise produced. This paper reviews macro trends in the performance of regulatory institutions in electricity and telecommunications sectors in India and evaluates the direction and pace of their work. It is felt that a perceptible change in several areas such as transparency and participatory approach in decision-making, availability of hitherto unavailable information, etc. has been brought about through functioning of these institutions. The contours of regulatory landscape are, however, in formative stages and much remains to be done. The paper discusses steps and mechanisms for further strengthening the regulatory institutions and processes. It is also opportune to initiate the process of benchmarking relative performance for evolving best practices and as a mechanism for applying corrective pressure on those lagging behind.","PeriodicalId":406236,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Regulation and Governance","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Regulation and Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/IJR-120015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Economic liberalization policies in India, since 1991, have recognized market as an institution to achieve efficient resource allocation and appropriate pricing structures. The need for distancing the government from investment and consumption decisions has also been felt in infrastructure sectors. Demand–supply mismatch, natural monopoly segments, and social considerations in these sectors have, however, necessitated the need for regulatory institutions within a deregulated environment. Independent regulation was conceived as a second-best option capable of delivering results, which the market would have otherwise produced. This paper reviews macro trends in the performance of regulatory institutions in electricity and telecommunications sectors in India and evaluates the direction and pace of their work. It is felt that a perceptible change in several areas such as transparency and participatory approach in decision-making, availability of hitherto unavailable information, etc. has been brought about through functioning of these institutions. The contours of regulatory landscape are, however, in formative stages and much remains to be done. The paper discusses steps and mechanisms for further strengthening the regulatory institutions and processes. It is also opportune to initiate the process of benchmarking relative performance for evolving best practices and as a mechanism for applying corrective pressure on those lagging behind.
印度基础设施服务的独立监管:综述
自1991年以来,印度的经济自由化政策承认市场是实现有效资源配置和适当定价结构的机制。基础设施领域也感受到了政府与投资和消费决策保持距离的必要性。然而,由于供需不匹配、自然垄断部门和这些部门的社会考虑,需要在放松管制的环境中建立监管机构。独立监管被认为是次优选择,能够产生市场本来会产生的结果。本文回顾了印度电力和电信部门监管机构绩效的宏观趋势,并评估了其工作的方向和步伐。人们认为,通过这些机构的运作,在决策方面的透明度和参与性做法、提供迄今无法获得的资料等几个方面都发生了明显的变化。然而,监管格局的轮廓仍处于形成阶段,还有许多工作要做。本文讨论了进一步加强监管机构和程序的步骤和机制。现在也是时候开始对发展最佳做法的相对绩效进行基准测试,并作为对落后国家施加纠正压力的机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信