Bringing Trust to Autonomous Mobility

Pavlos Kosmides, K. Demestichas, Konstantinos Avgerinakis, Eleni Trouva, Stefano Bianchi, A. Barisone, Konstantinos Risvas, K. Moustakas, Aleksandra Rodak, M. Kruszewski, Malgorzata Pedzierska
{"title":"Bringing Trust to Autonomous Mobility","authors":"Pavlos Kosmides, K. Demestichas, Konstantinos Avgerinakis, Eleni Trouva, Stefano Bianchi, A. Barisone, Konstantinos Risvas, K. Moustakas, Aleksandra Rodak, M. Kruszewski, Malgorzata Pedzierska","doi":"10.23919/AEITAUTOMOTIVE50086.2020.9307432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Last decade has been characterized by a huge advancement in the field of automated and connected transport. However, fully autonomous systems still need a lot of effort in order to be applied in transportation. Meanwhile, mixed traffic environments with semi-autonomous vehicles is becoming a norm. In such conditions, vehicles are passing the dynamic driving task back to the human by sending to drivers Requests to Intervene (RtI). At the same time, there is a need to evolve driver’s training in order to be able to safely use semi-automated vehicles, whereas driver intervention performance has to be made an integral part of both driver and technology assessment. Furthermore, the ethical implications of automated decision-making need to be properly assessed, giving rise to novel risk and liability analysis models. In this conceptual paper we present our vision to maximise the safety, trust and acceptance of automated vehicles. To achieve that, we propose an assessment framework to evaluate different technologies involved in Automated Driving Systems (ADS).","PeriodicalId":104806,"journal":{"name":"2020 AEIT International Conference of Electrical and Electronic Technologies for Automotive (AEIT AUTOMOTIVE)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 AEIT International Conference of Electrical and Electronic Technologies for Automotive (AEIT AUTOMOTIVE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/AEITAUTOMOTIVE50086.2020.9307432","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Last decade has been characterized by a huge advancement in the field of automated and connected transport. However, fully autonomous systems still need a lot of effort in order to be applied in transportation. Meanwhile, mixed traffic environments with semi-autonomous vehicles is becoming a norm. In such conditions, vehicles are passing the dynamic driving task back to the human by sending to drivers Requests to Intervene (RtI). At the same time, there is a need to evolve driver’s training in order to be able to safely use semi-automated vehicles, whereas driver intervention performance has to be made an integral part of both driver and technology assessment. Furthermore, the ethical implications of automated decision-making need to be properly assessed, giving rise to novel risk and liability analysis models. In this conceptual paper we present our vision to maximise the safety, trust and acceptance of automated vehicles. To achieve that, we propose an assessment framework to evaluate different technologies involved in Automated Driving Systems (ADS).
为自动驾驶带来信任
过去十年的特点是自动化和互联运输领域取得了巨大进步。然而,要想将全自动驾驶系统应用于交通运输领域,还需要付出很多努力。与此同时,半自动驾驶汽车的混合交通环境正在成为一种常态。在这种情况下,车辆通过向驾驶员发送干预请求(RtI),将动态驾驶任务交还给人类。与此同时,为了能够安全使用半自动驾驶汽车,有必要改进驾驶员的培训,而驾驶员的干预表现必须成为驾驶员和技术评估的一个组成部分。此外,需要适当评估自动化决策的伦理影响,从而产生新的风险和责任分析模型。在这篇概念性论文中,我们提出了我们的愿景,即最大限度地提高自动驾驶汽车的安全性、信任度和接受度。为了实现这一目标,我们提出了一个评估框架来评估自动驾驶系统(ADS)中涉及的不同技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信