Hypermnesia and Amnesia: Remembering (with) the Body and Post-Conflict Memorials and Architectures

A. Borsari, Giovanni Leoni
{"title":"Hypermnesia and Amnesia: Remembering (with) the Body and Post-Conflict Memorials and Architectures","authors":"A. Borsari, Giovanni Leoni","doi":"10.3897/hmc.2.70827","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article consists of two parts. The first part (§§ 1–2) investigates the indiscriminate and absolute remembering and forgetting of everything, hypermnesia and amnesia as the extreme terms that research has used and uses for the different phenomena of memory, both in individuals and in social and political forms. In the face of these shifts it is thus indispensable to re-establish a critique of the paradoxical effects of memory aids and, at the same time, to seek new forms of remembrance that by mixing an experiential dimension and public sphere refocus the attention on the connection between latency, tension and experiential triggers of involuntary memory and on the ability to break through the fictions of collective memory. On this basis, the second part of the article (§§ 3–4) analyses how the experience of political and racial deportation during World War II drastically changed the idea of memorial architecture. More specifically, the analysis deals with a kind of memorial device that must represent and memorialise persons whose bodies have been deliberately cancelled. The aim is to present and analyse the artistic and architectonic efforts to refer to those forgotten bodies, on the one hand, and on the other hand to point out how for these new kind of memorials the body of the visitor is asked to participate, both physically and emotionally, in this somehow paradoxical search for lost bodies, offering oneself as a substitute.","PeriodicalId":302470,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Heritage, Memory and Conflict","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Heritage, Memory and Conflict","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3897/hmc.2.70827","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article consists of two parts. The first part (§§ 1–2) investigates the indiscriminate and absolute remembering and forgetting of everything, hypermnesia and amnesia as the extreme terms that research has used and uses for the different phenomena of memory, both in individuals and in social and political forms. In the face of these shifts it is thus indispensable to re-establish a critique of the paradoxical effects of memory aids and, at the same time, to seek new forms of remembrance that by mixing an experiential dimension and public sphere refocus the attention on the connection between latency, tension and experiential triggers of involuntary memory and on the ability to break through the fictions of collective memory. On this basis, the second part of the article (§§ 3–4) analyses how the experience of political and racial deportation during World War II drastically changed the idea of memorial architecture. More specifically, the analysis deals with a kind of memorial device that must represent and memorialise persons whose bodies have been deliberately cancelled. The aim is to present and analyse the artistic and architectonic efforts to refer to those forgotten bodies, on the one hand, and on the other hand to point out how for these new kind of memorials the body of the visitor is asked to participate, both physically and emotionally, in this somehow paradoxical search for lost bodies, offering oneself as a substitute.
失忆症和健忘症:记忆(与)身体和冲突后的纪念碑和建筑
本文由两部分组成。第一部分(§§1-2)调查了不分皂白的和绝对的记忆和遗忘,过度记忆和健忘症,作为研究使用的极端术语,用于不同的记忆现象,无论是在个人还是在社会和政治形式中。面对这些转变,我们必须重新建立对记忆辅助的矛盾效果的批判,同时,通过混合经验维度和公共领域,寻求新的记忆形式,将注意力重新集中在非自愿记忆的潜伏期、张力和经验触发因素之间的联系上,以及突破集体记忆虚构的能力。在此基础上,文章的第二部分(§§3-4)分析了第二次世界大战期间政治和种族驱逐的经历如何彻底改变了纪念建筑的理念。更具体地说,分析涉及一种纪念装置,它必须代表和纪念那些身体被故意取消的人。目的是展示和分析艺术和建筑上的努力,以参考那些被遗忘的身体,另一方面,指出这些新的纪念馆如何要求游客的身体参与,无论是身体上还是情感上,在这种某种程度上矛盾的寻找失落的身体,提供自己作为替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信