EVALUATION OF MICROSOFT TEAMS AS A TOOL FOR SYNCHRONOUS INTERACTION DURING DISTANCE AND HYBRID LEARNING

O. Glazunova, V. Korolchuk, T. Voloshyna, T. Saiapina
{"title":"EVALUATION OF MICROSOFT TEAMS AS A TOOL FOR SYNCHRONOUS INTERACTION DURING DISTANCE AND HYBRID LEARNING","authors":"O. Glazunova, V. Korolchuk, T. Voloshyna, T. Saiapina","doi":"10.28925/2414-0325.2023.141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2019 and the beginning of the war in the country, educational institutions switched to online learning using tools for organizing and holding video conferences, ensuring synchronous and asynchronous interaction of participants in the educational process. This article offers definitions of advantages (organization of various types of educational activities online; organization of effective collaboration; provision of access to various types of educational content; organization of reflection and estimation) and disadvantages (unstable work and dependence on Internet access; inconvenience of use on mobile devices; the need for skills in using the tool) using Microsoft Teams for synchronous interaction during distance and hybrid learning. The authors developed criteria and indicators for evaluating Microsoft Teams as a tool for synchronous interaction in modern conditions, such as functionality, reliability, effectiveness, interaction, accessibility, security and privacy, technical support and assistance. An example of a scheme of synchronous interaction when organizing an educational activity using Microsoft Teams is given, namely: creating a meeting room, inviting students to an online class, creating a meeting class (lecture, laboratory work, discussion, class recording), uploading various types of educational content, placing an announcement or a post, assignment assessment, or test. 17 scientific and pedagogical workers who have practical experience of using Microsoft Teams as a tool of synchronous interaction during distance and hybrid studies were involved for expert evaluation according to the specified criteria and indicators. The provided assessment of the capabilities of Microsoft Teams for synchronous interaction shows that the most significant indicators are the presence of a function for organizing and supporting synchronous interaction between participants in the educational process (0.09); the ability to interact with video and audio content to improve understanding and assimilation of educational material in real time (0.08); availability of tools for setting up interaction and collaboration in synchronous mode (interactive whiteboard, screen sharing, various types of documents) (0.08).","PeriodicalId":145377,"journal":{"name":"OPEN EDUCATIONAL E-ENVIRONMENT OF MODERN UNIVERSITY","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OPEN EDUCATIONAL E-ENVIRONMENT OF MODERN UNIVERSITY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28925/2414-0325.2023.141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

After the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2019 and the beginning of the war in the country, educational institutions switched to online learning using tools for organizing and holding video conferences, ensuring synchronous and asynchronous interaction of participants in the educational process. This article offers definitions of advantages (organization of various types of educational activities online; organization of effective collaboration; provision of access to various types of educational content; organization of reflection and estimation) and disadvantages (unstable work and dependence on Internet access; inconvenience of use on mobile devices; the need for skills in using the tool) using Microsoft Teams for synchronous interaction during distance and hybrid learning. The authors developed criteria and indicators for evaluating Microsoft Teams as a tool for synchronous interaction in modern conditions, such as functionality, reliability, effectiveness, interaction, accessibility, security and privacy, technical support and assistance. An example of a scheme of synchronous interaction when organizing an educational activity using Microsoft Teams is given, namely: creating a meeting room, inviting students to an online class, creating a meeting class (lecture, laboratory work, discussion, class recording), uploading various types of educational content, placing an announcement or a post, assignment assessment, or test. 17 scientific and pedagogical workers who have practical experience of using Microsoft Teams as a tool of synchronous interaction during distance and hybrid studies were involved for expert evaluation according to the specified criteria and indicators. The provided assessment of the capabilities of Microsoft Teams for synchronous interaction shows that the most significant indicators are the presence of a function for organizing and supporting synchronous interaction between participants in the educational process (0.09); the ability to interact with video and audio content to improve understanding and assimilation of educational material in real time (0.08); availability of tools for setting up interaction and collaboration in synchronous mode (interactive whiteboard, screen sharing, various types of documents) (0.08).
微软团队在远程和混合学习中作为同步交互工具的评估
2019年新冠肺炎疫情爆发和国内战争爆发后,教育机构转向在线学习,利用组织和召开视频会议的工具,确保参与者在教育过程中的同步和异步互动。本文给出了优势的定义(组织各类在线教育活动;组织有效的协作;提供获取各类教育内容的途径;组织反思和评估)和缺点(工作不稳定,依赖互联网接入;在移动设备上使用不便;需要使用工具的技能)在远程和混合学习期间使用Microsoft Teams进行同步交互。作者制定了标准和指标来评估Microsoft Teams作为现代条件下同步交互的工具,如功能、可靠性、有效性、交互、可访问性、安全性和隐私性、技术支持和帮助。给出了一个使用Microsoft Teams组织教育活动时同步交互方案的示例,即:创建会议室,邀请学生参加在线课程,创建会议课程(讲座,实验室工作,讨论,课堂录音),上传各种类型的教育内容,发布公告或帖子,作业评估或测试。17名具有在远程和混合研究中使用Microsoft Teams作为同步交互工具的实际经验的科学和教学工作者参与了根据规定的标准和指标进行专家评估。对Microsoft Teams同步交互能力的评估表明,最重要的指标是在教育过程中组织和支持参与者之间同步交互的功能的存在(0.09);与视频和音频内容互动的能力,以提高对教育材料的理解和吸收(0.08);在同步模式下设置交互和协作的工具的可用性(交互式白板、屏幕共享、各种类型的文档)(0.08)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信