Demography of Censorship: Examining Correlations Between Community Demographics and Materials Challenges in Canadian Libraries

Michael J. Nyby
{"title":"Demography of Censorship: Examining Correlations Between Community Demographics and Materials Challenges in Canadian Libraries","authors":"Michael J. Nyby","doi":"10.21083/partnership.v18i1.7105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines materials challenges in Canadian libraries, compiled by the Canadian Federation of Library Associations (CFLA), with the intention of identifying demographic trends in patron challenge behaviour. By cross-referencing the CFLA data with five demographic fields from the 2016 Canadian census of population (median age, city size, educational attainment level, median income, and political representation), the study aims to determine whether challenges of a certain nature are more likely to occur in communities with certain demographic profiles. The study identifies twenty-two challenge categories derived from user complaints and three ideological alignments of challenges based on the political ideology standards set by moral foundations theory. Though the available sample is too small to draw any definitive conclusions, some strong trends were apparent. Findings show that the most common challenge types, challenges to racist content and sexual content, are fairly consistent throughout demographic groupings, but notable correlations were found between demographic profiles and materials concerning LGBTQIA+ issues. Progressive-leaning communities were far more likely to challenge homophobic/transphobic materials while conservative-leaning communities challenged more LGBTQIA+-positive works. From an ideological standpoint, young communities tend to be the most progressive in their challenge behaviour, while communities with a low level of educational attainment tend to be the most conservative in their challenge behaviour.","PeriodicalId":406213,"journal":{"name":"Partnership: The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Partnership: The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21083/partnership.v18i1.7105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study examines materials challenges in Canadian libraries, compiled by the Canadian Federation of Library Associations (CFLA), with the intention of identifying demographic trends in patron challenge behaviour. By cross-referencing the CFLA data with five demographic fields from the 2016 Canadian census of population (median age, city size, educational attainment level, median income, and political representation), the study aims to determine whether challenges of a certain nature are more likely to occur in communities with certain demographic profiles. The study identifies twenty-two challenge categories derived from user complaints and three ideological alignments of challenges based on the political ideology standards set by moral foundations theory. Though the available sample is too small to draw any definitive conclusions, some strong trends were apparent. Findings show that the most common challenge types, challenges to racist content and sexual content, are fairly consistent throughout demographic groupings, but notable correlations were found between demographic profiles and materials concerning LGBTQIA+ issues. Progressive-leaning communities were far more likely to challenge homophobic/transphobic materials while conservative-leaning communities challenged more LGBTQIA+-positive works. From an ideological standpoint, young communities tend to be the most progressive in their challenge behaviour, while communities with a low level of educational attainment tend to be the most conservative in their challenge behaviour.
审查的人口统计:加拿大图书馆社区人口统计与材料挑战之间的关系
本研究考察了加拿大图书馆的材料挑战,由加拿大图书馆协会联合会(CFLA)编制,旨在确定读者挑战行为的人口趋势。通过将CFLA数据与2016年加拿大人口普查的五个人口统计领域(年龄中位数、城市规模、受教育程度、收入中位数和政治代表性)进行交叉对照,该研究旨在确定某种性质的挑战是否更有可能发生在具有某些人口统计特征的社区。该研究确定了来自用户投诉的22种挑战类别和基于道德基础理论设定的政治意识形态标准的3种挑战意识形态联盟。虽然现有的样本太小,无法得出任何明确的结论,但一些明显的趋势是明显的。研究结果表明,最常见的挑战类型,对种族主义内容和性内容的挑战,在人口统计分组中是相当一致的,但在人口统计资料和有关LGBTQIA+问题的材料之间发现了显著的相关性。进步倾向的社区更有可能挑战恐同/恐跨者的材料,而保守倾向的社区则更有可能挑战更多LGBTQIA+积极的作品。从意识形态的角度来看,年轻社区在挑战行为上往往是最进步的,而教育程度较低的社区在挑战行为上往往是最保守的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信