Theories in cognition & emotion – social functions of emotion

K. Scherer
{"title":"Theories in cognition & emotion – social functions of emotion","authors":"K. Scherer","doi":"10.1080/02699931.2022.2072628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT It is widely recognised that emotions have important social functions, particularly with respect to the interaction between individual needs and preferences and socio-cultural norms and values. So far, however, a general theoretical framework has been missing for the social functions of emotion. In this issue of the special theory section of Cognition & Emotion, an invited article by Keltner et al. proposes an expanded version of social functionalist theory entitled “How emotions, relationships, and culture constitute each other”, which attempts to remedy this situation. Two invited commentaries, by Manstead and Von Scheve, welcome this attempt but enumerate issues in need of further elaboration, such as the interaction between relational needs and cultural norms, the necessity to consider situational context and cultural differences, and a more stringent specification of “functionality”. The remainder of the current introductory article briefly outlines some areas in need of attention from social emotion theories, such as the effect of social and technological change on the elicitation and regulation of emotions. Here, earlier work is cited that evokes the danger of a potential waning of shame and guilt feelings due to changing values, norms, and self-ideals (for example, the growing importance of self-related values such as freedom and the weakening of prosocial values such as the responsibility for the common good). Another problem is group polarisation leading to negative emotions such as hate and potential violence taken together, the contributions to this theory section highlight the importance of creating a comprehensive theoretical framework for studying the social functions of emotions.","PeriodicalId":128345,"journal":{"name":"Cognition and Emotion","volume":"261 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognition and Emotion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2022.2072628","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT It is widely recognised that emotions have important social functions, particularly with respect to the interaction between individual needs and preferences and socio-cultural norms and values. So far, however, a general theoretical framework has been missing for the social functions of emotion. In this issue of the special theory section of Cognition & Emotion, an invited article by Keltner et al. proposes an expanded version of social functionalist theory entitled “How emotions, relationships, and culture constitute each other”, which attempts to remedy this situation. Two invited commentaries, by Manstead and Von Scheve, welcome this attempt but enumerate issues in need of further elaboration, such as the interaction between relational needs and cultural norms, the necessity to consider situational context and cultural differences, and a more stringent specification of “functionality”. The remainder of the current introductory article briefly outlines some areas in need of attention from social emotion theories, such as the effect of social and technological change on the elicitation and regulation of emotions. Here, earlier work is cited that evokes the danger of a potential waning of shame and guilt feelings due to changing values, norms, and self-ideals (for example, the growing importance of self-related values such as freedom and the weakening of prosocial values such as the responsibility for the common good). Another problem is group polarisation leading to negative emotions such as hate and potential violence taken together, the contributions to this theory section highlight the importance of creating a comprehensive theoretical framework for studying the social functions of emotions.
认知与情感理论——情感的社会功能
人们普遍认为情绪具有重要的社会功能,特别是在个体需求和偏好与社会文化规范和价值观之间的相互作用方面。然而,到目前为止,情感的社会功能还缺乏一个通用的理论框架。在本期的《认知与情感》特别理论版块中,Keltner等人的一篇特邀文章提出了一个扩展版的社会功能主义理论,题为“情感、关系和文化是如何相互构成的”,试图纠正这种情况。Manstead和Von Scheve的两位受邀评论对这种尝试表示欢迎,但列举了需要进一步阐述的问题,例如关系需求与文化规范之间的相互作用,考虑情境背景和文化差异的必要性,以及更严格的“功能”规范。当前介绍性文章的其余部分简要概述了社会情绪理论需要关注的一些领域,例如社会和技术变革对情绪的激发和调节的影响。在这里,引用了早期的工作,唤起了由于价值观、规范和自我理想的变化(例如,自由等与自我相关的价值观日益重要,亲社会价值观(如对共同利益的责任)的削弱)而导致羞耻感和内疚感潜在减弱的危险。另一个问题是群体极化导致负面情绪,如仇恨和潜在的暴力,这一理论部分的贡献强调了创建一个全面的理论框架来研究情绪的社会功能的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信