Licensing Online Content to Ensure Patron Privacy: An Informal Survey of Oregon Librarians

Jill Emery
{"title":"Licensing Online Content to Ensure Patron Privacy: An Informal Survey of Oregon Librarians","authors":"Jill Emery","doi":"10.5399/osu/1093-7374.27.01.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Librarians throughout Oregon are committed to securing the rights for patrons utilizing resources within their libraries with the greatest level of protection regarding their online identities as possible. At the same time, Oregon librarians are committed to providing their patrons with the online resources they want to access whether it is a public library, an academic library, a community college library, or a health services library. Finding the balance between providing the desired online content with the safeguards that protect their patrons can be difficult. Oregon librarians recognize the need to secure patrons' online privacy but also want to meet patron demands for resources. Patrons tend to prioritize their quest for content over their personal privacy concerns. By contrast, librarians evaluate the privacy needs of their community as a whole as opposed to on an individual level. They are committed to the third principle of the American Library Association's Code of Ethics: \"We protect each library user's right to privacy and confidentiality with respect to information sought or received and resources consulted, borrowed, acquired or transmitted\" (ALA, 2021).\nAs with many issues in the 21st century, a tension exists between the individual's wants and the best practices for community well-being. To better understand this inherent conflict between access and security, I asked several Oregon librarians to answer a series of questions about their electronic resource licensing practices. This article outlines the current practices these colleagues employ to reconcile this tension between patron demand and patron safety and to identify ways for improving the situation regarding online resource usage.","PeriodicalId":298209,"journal":{"name":"OLA Quarterly","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OLA Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5399/osu/1093-7374.27.01.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Librarians throughout Oregon are committed to securing the rights for patrons utilizing resources within their libraries with the greatest level of protection regarding their online identities as possible. At the same time, Oregon librarians are committed to providing their patrons with the online resources they want to access whether it is a public library, an academic library, a community college library, or a health services library. Finding the balance between providing the desired online content with the safeguards that protect their patrons can be difficult. Oregon librarians recognize the need to secure patrons' online privacy but also want to meet patron demands for resources. Patrons tend to prioritize their quest for content over their personal privacy concerns. By contrast, librarians evaluate the privacy needs of their community as a whole as opposed to on an individual level. They are committed to the third principle of the American Library Association's Code of Ethics: "We protect each library user's right to privacy and confidentiality with respect to information sought or received and resources consulted, borrowed, acquired or transmitted" (ALA, 2021). As with many issues in the 21st century, a tension exists between the individual's wants and the best practices for community well-being. To better understand this inherent conflict between access and security, I asked several Oregon librarians to answer a series of questions about their electronic resource licensing practices. This article outlines the current practices these colleagues employ to reconcile this tension between patron demand and patron safety and to identify ways for improving the situation regarding online resource usage.
授权在线内容以确保用户隐私:俄勒冈州图书馆员的非正式调查
整个俄勒冈州的图书馆员都致力于保护读者利用图书馆资源的权利,尽可能保护他们的在线身份。与此同时,俄勒冈州的图书馆员致力于为他们的读者提供他们想要访问的在线资源,无论是公共图书馆、学术图书馆、社区大学图书馆还是卫生服务图书馆。在提供所需的在线内容与保护其用户的安全措施之间找到平衡可能很困难。俄勒冈州的图书馆员认识到保护读者在线隐私的必要性,但也希望满足读者对资源的需求。用户倾向于优先考虑他们对内容的追求,而不是他们的个人隐私问题。相比之下,图书馆员将社区的隐私需求作为一个整体来评估,而不是在个人层面上。他们致力于美国图书馆协会道德准则的第三条原则:“我们保护每个图书馆用户在寻求或收到的信息以及咨询、借阅、获取或传播的资源方面的隐私权和保密性”(ALA, 2021)。与21世纪的许多问题一样,个人的需求与社区福祉的最佳实践之间存在着紧张关系。为了更好地理解访问和安全之间的内在冲突,我请俄勒冈州的几位图书管理员回答了一系列关于他们的电子资源许可实践的问题。本文概述了这些同事为调和读者需求和读者安全之间的紧张关系而采用的当前做法,并确定了改善在线资源使用情况的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信