Issues in International Employee Assistance Program Accreditation

D. Masi
{"title":"Issues in International Employee Assistance Program Accreditation","authors":"D. Masi","doi":"10.1300/J022v19n01_06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article describes the present size of Employee Assistance Programs outside of the United States. It emphasizes the rapid growth and the development of the profession beyond the Employee Assistance Professionals Association (EAPA). It then discusses the international programs and approaches to accreditation. Suggestions are made for international agencies that might be apprehensive about standards being too “American” and not being cross-culturally applicable. The Council on Accreditation (COA) appears the most logical, but the author also describes the recent development of worldwide guidelines, which have been sponsored by numbers of EAP groups. The guidelines might be a pathway or intermediary step to accreditation for those international EAPs that do not feel they are prepared to undergo the formal COA process.","PeriodicalId":246202,"journal":{"name":"Employee Assistance Quarterly","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Employee Assistance Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1300/J022v19n01_06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Abstract This article describes the present size of Employee Assistance Programs outside of the United States. It emphasizes the rapid growth and the development of the profession beyond the Employee Assistance Professionals Association (EAPA). It then discusses the international programs and approaches to accreditation. Suggestions are made for international agencies that might be apprehensive about standards being too “American” and not being cross-culturally applicable. The Council on Accreditation (COA) appears the most logical, but the author also describes the recent development of worldwide guidelines, which have been sponsored by numbers of EAP groups. The guidelines might be a pathway or intermediary step to accreditation for those international EAPs that do not feel they are prepared to undergo the formal COA process.
国际员工援助计划认证的问题
本文描述了目前美国以外的员工援助计划的规模。它强调了员工援助专业人员协会(EAPA)之外的快速增长和职业发展。然后讨论国际项目和认证方法。对于可能担心标准过于“美国化”而不能跨文化适用的国际机构,提出了建议。认证委员会(COA)似乎是最符合逻辑的,但作者也描述了最近由许多EAP团体赞助的全球指导方针的发展。对于那些认为自己还没有准备好接受正式COA程序的国际eap,该指南可能是获得认证的途径或中间步骤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信