A heuristic approach towards minimizing resource allocation for femto base station deployment

A. Kundu, S. Majumder, I. S. Misra, S. Sanyal
{"title":"A heuristic approach towards minimizing resource allocation for femto base station deployment","authors":"A. Kundu, S. Majumder, I. S. Misra, S. Sanyal","doi":"10.1109/EuCNC.2016.7561057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent research proposes co-channel Femto Base Stations (coFBSs) as probable solution to dead-zone problem. However, random coFBS deployment causes unwanted interference, and degrades Quality of Service (QoS) of users. Hence, coFBS placement needs rigorous planning. In this work, the coFBS Placement Problem (FBSPP) is proved to be NP-hard. To solve FBSPP, GSM, a greedy heuristic and PSOM, a Swarm Optimization approach, are then proposed. The target is to maximize coverage of a given region by optimal coFBS deployment. Coverage is a function of Received Signal Strength and interference experienced by the end users. Results have been compared with the Exhaustive Search Method (ESM). Simulation results exhibit that both PSOM and ESM provide 100% accurate solution. Compared to GSM, PSOM provides more accurate solutions but needs notably higher computation time. The computational demand for ESM turns out to be very high and is difficult to run even for moderate sized instances.","PeriodicalId":416277,"journal":{"name":"2016 European Conference on Networks and Communications (EuCNC)","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 European Conference on Networks and Communications (EuCNC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EuCNC.2016.7561057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Recent research proposes co-channel Femto Base Stations (coFBSs) as probable solution to dead-zone problem. However, random coFBS deployment causes unwanted interference, and degrades Quality of Service (QoS) of users. Hence, coFBS placement needs rigorous planning. In this work, the coFBS Placement Problem (FBSPP) is proved to be NP-hard. To solve FBSPP, GSM, a greedy heuristic and PSOM, a Swarm Optimization approach, are then proposed. The target is to maximize coverage of a given region by optimal coFBS deployment. Coverage is a function of Received Signal Strength and interference experienced by the end users. Results have been compared with the Exhaustive Search Method (ESM). Simulation results exhibit that both PSOM and ESM provide 100% accurate solution. Compared to GSM, PSOM provides more accurate solutions but needs notably higher computation time. The computational demand for ESM turns out to be very high and is difficult to run even for moderate sized instances.
femto基站部署中资源分配最小化的启发式方法
近年来的研究提出采用同信道的Femto基站(coFBSs)作为解决死区问题的可能方法。但是,随机部署coFBS会造成不必要的干扰,并降低用户的服务质量(QoS)。因此,coFBS的安置需要严格的规划。在这项工作中,证明了coFBS布置问题(FBSPP)是np困难的。针对FBSPP问题,提出了贪心启发式算法GSM和群优化算法PSOM。目标是通过优化coFBS部署来最大化给定区域的覆盖率。覆盖范围是接收信号强度和最终用户所经历的干扰的函数。结果与穷举搜索法(ESM)进行了比较。仿真结果表明,PSOM和ESM均能提供100%的精确解。与GSM相比,PSOM提供了更精确的解决方案,但需要明显更高的计算时间。ESM的计算需求非常高,即使对于中等规模的实例也很难运行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信