Strategic Grading in the Product Acquisition Process of a Reverse Supply Chain

Stefan Hahler, M. Fleischmann
{"title":"Strategic Grading in the Product Acquisition Process of a Reverse Supply Chain","authors":"Stefan Hahler, M. Fleischmann","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2636729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most recommerce providers have moved to a quality-dependent process for the acquisition of used products. They acquire the products via websites at which product holders submit upfront quality statements and receive quality-dependent acquisition prices for their used devices. \n \nMotivated by this development of reverse logistics practice, the aim of this paper is to analyse the product assessment process of a recommerce provider in detail. To this end, we first propose a sequential bargaining model with complete information which captures the individual behaviour of the recommerce provider and the product holder. We determine the optimal strategies of the product holder and the recommerce provider in this game. We find that the resulting strategies lead to an efficient allocation, although the recommerce provider can absorb most of the bargaining potential due to his last mover advantage. \n \nIn a second step, we relax the assumption of complete information and include uncertainty about the product holder's residual product value. We show the trade-off underlying the recommerce provider's optimal counteroffer decision and analyse the optimal strategy, using a logistic regression approach on a real-life data set of nearly 60,000 product submissions. The results reveal a significant improvement potential, compared to the currently applied strategy.","PeriodicalId":129698,"journal":{"name":"Supply Chain Management eJournal","volume":"198 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"32","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Supply Chain Management eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2636729","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

Abstract

Most recommerce providers have moved to a quality-dependent process for the acquisition of used products. They acquire the products via websites at which product holders submit upfront quality statements and receive quality-dependent acquisition prices for their used devices. Motivated by this development of reverse logistics practice, the aim of this paper is to analyse the product assessment process of a recommerce provider in detail. To this end, we first propose a sequential bargaining model with complete information which captures the individual behaviour of the recommerce provider and the product holder. We determine the optimal strategies of the product holder and the recommerce provider in this game. We find that the resulting strategies lead to an efficient allocation, although the recommerce provider can absorb most of the bargaining potential due to his last mover advantage. In a second step, we relax the assumption of complete information and include uncertainty about the product holder's residual product value. We show the trade-off underlying the recommerce provider's optimal counteroffer decision and analyse the optimal strategy, using a logistic regression approach on a real-life data set of nearly 60,000 product submissions. The results reveal a significant improvement potential, compared to the currently applied strategy.
逆向供应链产品获取过程中的战略分级
大多数再商务提供商已经转向依赖于质量的流程来获取二手产品。他们通过网站购买产品,产品持有人在网站上提交预先质量声明,并收到他们使用过的设备的质量相关收购价格。在这种逆向物流实践发展的推动下,本文的目的是详细分析再商务供应商的产品评估过程。为此,我们首先提出了一个具有完整信息的顺序议价模型,该模型捕捉了再商务提供者和产品持有人的个体行为。在此博弈中,我们确定了产品持有者和再商务提供者的最优策略。我们发现,尽管再商务提供商由于其后发优势可以吸收大部分议价潜力,但由此产生的策略导致了有效的配置。在第二步中,我们放宽了完全信息的假设,并包含了产品持有者剩余产品价值的不确定性。我们展示了再商务提供商最优还价决策背后的权衡,并分析了最优策略,使用逻辑回归方法对近60,000个产品提交的真实数据集进行了分析。与目前应用的策略相比,结果显示出显著的改进潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信