Bioethics in Critical Care Patients

M. A. García, M. Arenas, A. M. Cornejo
{"title":"Bioethics in Critical Care Patients","authors":"M. A. García, M. Arenas, A. M. Cornejo","doi":"10.5772/INTECHOPEN.75565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Intensive care unit is a special medial environment for many reasons (the severity of the patients, the important technological advances). In recent years, the medicine has changed to a more focused practice on the patient, leaving behind the paternalistic medical approach, with a transparent new relationship with the patient and his family. The ethical principles-autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence and justice-and the possibility of con- flicts between them make decision-making very complex. The admission of these patients in our unit is justified based on a triangle-acute, severe, and recoverable disease-trying to optimize their treatment. Unfavorable later evolution is possible; a palliative management can often be considered, changing the patient ’ s approach from the cure of his illness to the relief of his symptoms. Decisions about patient ’ s future must be jointly made by the health care team, the patient and his family. We must look for documents about previous instruc- tions and/or opinion of a substitute decision-maker. We must humanize our units, think-ing about the best care for the sick person and his family, and improve the support to the family after his death. Therefore, the development of practice guidelines on palliative care should be promoted by the hospitals.","PeriodicalId":380575,"journal":{"name":"Reflections on Bioethics","volume":"197 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reflections on Bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5772/INTECHOPEN.75565","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intensive care unit is a special medial environment for many reasons (the severity of the patients, the important technological advances). In recent years, the medicine has changed to a more focused practice on the patient, leaving behind the paternalistic medical approach, with a transparent new relationship with the patient and his family. The ethical principles-autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence and justice-and the possibility of con- flicts between them make decision-making very complex. The admission of these patients in our unit is justified based on a triangle-acute, severe, and recoverable disease-trying to optimize their treatment. Unfavorable later evolution is possible; a palliative management can often be considered, changing the patient ’ s approach from the cure of his illness to the relief of his symptoms. Decisions about patient ’ s future must be jointly made by the health care team, the patient and his family. We must look for documents about previous instruc- tions and/or opinion of a substitute decision-maker. We must humanize our units, think-ing about the best care for the sick person and his family, and improve the support to the family after his death. Therefore, the development of practice guidelines on palliative care should be promoted by the hospitals.
危重病人的生命伦理学
重症监护室是一个特殊的医疗环境,有很多原因(病人的严重程度,重要的技术进步)。近年来,医学已经转变为更加关注患者的实践,抛弃了家长式的医疗方法,与患者及其家属建立了透明的新关系。伦理原则——自治、善、无害和正义——以及它们之间可能发生的冲突使得决策非常复杂。这些病人的入院是合理的基于一个三角形-急性,严重和可恢复的疾病-试图优化他们的治疗。不利的后期进化是可能的;通常可以考虑姑息治疗,将病人的治疗方法从治愈疾病转变为减轻症状。关于病人未来的决定必须由医疗团队、病人和他的家人共同做出。我们必须查找有关先前指示和/或替代决策者意见的文件。我们必须使我们的单位人性化,考虑到对病人及其家属的最好照顾,并改善对他死后家属的支持。因此,姑息治疗实践指南的制定应由医院推动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信