A machine learning approach for medical device classification

Aaron Ceross, Jeroen H. M. Bergmann
{"title":"A machine learning approach for medical device classification","authors":"Aaron Ceross, Jeroen H. M. Bergmann","doi":"10.1145/3494193.3494232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The growth of medical device innovation over the last decades has necessitated the need for strong regulatory control in order to ensure the safety and performance of such devices. Medical devices are categorised according to the risk posed to the public. However, the legislation describing the classification rules are often dense and difficult to read. In order to facilitate device classification, the medical device regulator in Australia, the Therapeutic Goods Authority (TGA), provides online digital support tool for device classification. In this work, we (i) evaluate the online tool and (ii) make a further a proposal for using machine learning as means to provide more effective results. For the first part of this work, we asses whether the tool increases the readability of the legislative rules by evaluating the Flesch reading ease score of the legislation and the tool. While the online tool provides some degree of simplicity and readability over the legislation, we argue that the TGA can make more use of its data in order to provide more effective services. In the second part, we develop a proof-of-concept machine learning model to classify a device based on its stated purpose. The results of the experiment show a 82% weighted accuracy across four class labels, indicating that a more data-driven approach could be adopted by the authority.","PeriodicalId":360191,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3494193.3494232","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The growth of medical device innovation over the last decades has necessitated the need for strong regulatory control in order to ensure the safety and performance of such devices. Medical devices are categorised according to the risk posed to the public. However, the legislation describing the classification rules are often dense and difficult to read. In order to facilitate device classification, the medical device regulator in Australia, the Therapeutic Goods Authority (TGA), provides online digital support tool for device classification. In this work, we (i) evaluate the online tool and (ii) make a further a proposal for using machine learning as means to provide more effective results. For the first part of this work, we asses whether the tool increases the readability of the legislative rules by evaluating the Flesch reading ease score of the legislation and the tool. While the online tool provides some degree of simplicity and readability over the legislation, we argue that the TGA can make more use of its data in order to provide more effective services. In the second part, we develop a proof-of-concept machine learning model to classify a device based on its stated purpose. The results of the experiment show a 82% weighted accuracy across four class labels, indicating that a more data-driven approach could be adopted by the authority.
医疗器械分类的机器学习方法
在过去的几十年里,医疗设备创新的增长已经需要强有力的监管控制,以确保这些设备的安全性和性能。医疗仪器按对公众构成的风险分类。然而,描述分类规则的立法往往是密集的,难以阅读。为了方便器械分类,澳大利亚的医疗器械监管机构——治疗用品管理局(TGA)提供了器械分类的在线数字支持工具。在这项工作中,我们(i)评估在线工具,(ii)进一步提出使用机器学习作为提供更有效结果的手段的建议。在本工作的第一部分,我们通过评估立法和工具的Flesch阅读易用性得分来评估该工具是否提高了立法规则的可读性。虽然在线工具在立法上提供了一定程度的简单性和可读性,但我们认为TGA可以更多地利用其数据以提供更有效的服务。在第二部分中,我们开发了一个概念验证机器学习模型,根据其声明的目的对设备进行分类。实验结果显示,四个类别标签的加权准确率为82%,这表明当局可以采用更数据驱动的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信