Social Programming as a Possibility to Increase Social Efficiency

V. Terziev, V. Banabakova, M. Georgiev
{"title":"Social Programming as a Possibility to Increase Social Efficiency","authors":"V. Terziev, V. Banabakova, M. Georgiev","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3138151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In order for the assessment to be reliable, it should be carried out by specialists, using consistent modern standards of methodology. In addition, the information on the assessment results should be available to the main interested parties and should be considered by as wide range of specialists as possible, who are involved in the implementation, financing or development of the social program. Thus, the primary method, used to determine the efficiency of state programs for social support of the population, are the assessment studies of various performance indicators at all stages of implementation of the program. In particular, this concerns the following: – at the stage of development: the program project is assessed by qualitative indicators of the fixed in it basic value reference points (degree of compliance of the 138 objectives of the creators of the program with the objectives of the socio-economic development of the country, the declared legal norms and principles, as well as the expectations of the subjects of the program); – at the implementation stage: the efficiency of the program, expressed in qualitative indicators of the organizational, legal and management components in the implementation of the program (a condition for the efficient social state government appears to be the presence of an effective mechanism for coordination of the social impacts in state social service – an executor of the program); – at the final (assessment) stage: the program is assessed by quantitative indicators of the economic component of efficiency (correlation of the volume of services and their value in terms of limited human and material resources) and qualitative indicators (the degree of compliance of the objectives of managers and organizers of the program with the needs of the subjects of the program). Given the entire multi-aspect character of the assessment of the effectiveness of social programming and its product – the social program, in the context of the management by results, in compliance with the principle \"what-if\", according to the social work priorities, stemming from the dynamic changes within the social environment, we consider appropriate to offer a model for assessment of the effectiveness, based on the approach of \"organizational effectiveness\".","PeriodicalId":447936,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Social Choice & Welfare (Topic)","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Social Choice & Welfare (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3138151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

In order for the assessment to be reliable, it should be carried out by specialists, using consistent modern standards of methodology. In addition, the information on the assessment results should be available to the main interested parties and should be considered by as wide range of specialists as possible, who are involved in the implementation, financing or development of the social program. Thus, the primary method, used to determine the efficiency of state programs for social support of the population, are the assessment studies of various performance indicators at all stages of implementation of the program. In particular, this concerns the following: – at the stage of development: the program project is assessed by qualitative indicators of the fixed in it basic value reference points (degree of compliance of the 138 objectives of the creators of the program with the objectives of the socio-economic development of the country, the declared legal norms and principles, as well as the expectations of the subjects of the program); – at the implementation stage: the efficiency of the program, expressed in qualitative indicators of the organizational, legal and management components in the implementation of the program (a condition for the efficient social state government appears to be the presence of an effective mechanism for coordination of the social impacts in state social service – an executor of the program); – at the final (assessment) stage: the program is assessed by quantitative indicators of the economic component of efficiency (correlation of the volume of services and their value in terms of limited human and material resources) and qualitative indicators (the degree of compliance of the objectives of managers and organizers of the program with the needs of the subjects of the program). Given the entire multi-aspect character of the assessment of the effectiveness of social programming and its product – the social program, in the context of the management by results, in compliance with the principle "what-if", according to the social work priorities, stemming from the dynamic changes within the social environment, we consider appropriate to offer a model for assessment of the effectiveness, based on the approach of "organizational effectiveness".
社会规划是提高社会效率的一种可能性
为了使评估可靠,应由专家使用一致的现代标准方法进行评估。此外,关于评估结果的资料应提供给主要有关方面,并应由参与社会方案的执行、筹资或发展的尽可能广泛的专家加以考虑。因此,用于确定国家人口社会支持计划效率的主要方法是对计划实施各个阶段的各种绩效指标进行评估研究。具体而言,这涉及以下方面:-在发展阶段:通过确定其基本价值参考点的定性指标对方案项目进行评估(方案创建者的138个目标与国家社会经济发展目标、宣布的法律规范和原则以及方案主体的期望的符合程度);-在实施阶段:方案的效率,以实施方案的组织、法律和管理组成部分的定性指标来表示(有效的社会国家政府的一个条件似乎是存在有效的机制来协调国家社会服务的社会影响-方案的执行者);-在最后(评估)阶段:通过效率的经济组成部分的定量指标(服务量及其在有限的人力和物质资源方面的价值的相关性)和定性指标(计划的管理者和组织者的目标与计划主体的需求的符合程度)来评估计划。鉴于社会项目及其产品——社会项目有效性评估的整体多面性,在结果管理的背景下,遵循“假设”原则,根据社会工作的优先次序,源于社会环境的动态变化,我们认为提供一个基于“组织有效性”方法的有效性评估模型是合适的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信