CNN Architecture on Distinguishing Art and Photo: A Comparison

Herlambang Dwi Prasetyo, Pandu Ananto Hogantara, Irzan Fajari Nurahmadan, R. Arjuna, Ika Nurlaili Isnainiyah, Rio Wirawan
{"title":"CNN Architecture on Distinguishing Art and Photo: A Comparison","authors":"Herlambang Dwi Prasetyo, Pandu Ananto Hogantara, Irzan Fajari Nurahmadan, R. Arjuna, Ika Nurlaili Isnainiyah, Rio Wirawan","doi":"10.1109/ICIMCIS53775.2021.9699297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Painting and photography are growing with the advancement of technology and globalization. Painting and photography techniques are also developing along with the times. The art of painting is growing, marked by the increasing number of artists, especially in the realism genre. Many artists compete to create painting that is very similar to the original, making it difficult to tell the difference between a hand-drawn painting and a photo taken by a camera. Human limitations in distinguishing the two things need to be overcome with a system that is able to classify them automatically. We try to build a model for image classification, with the hope that the best model is able to classify which are photos and which are images. The best model is expected to be able to overcome human weaknesses in classifying which are photos and which are images. We compared three transfer learning architectures, namely the MobileNet-V1 architecture, the VGG-19 architecture, and the Xception architecture to find out which transfer learning architecture is the best for classifying the two classes, we choose several transfer learning architectural models that have been proven in previous studies to classify images with excellent result. After conducting and evaluating a series of experiments on each CNN model, the best model obtained for classifying images into painting or photo classes in this study is the Xception model trained with a dropout rate value of 0.5 which managed to gain a validation accuracy of 92.59% and test accuracy of 93.52%. The difference between the two values does not have much difference which indicates the model is not overfitting and also the other metrics score of the Xception model showing excellent result","PeriodicalId":250460,"journal":{"name":"2021 International Conference on Informatics, Multimedia, Cyber and Information System (ICIMCIS","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 International Conference on Informatics, Multimedia, Cyber and Information System (ICIMCIS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIMCIS53775.2021.9699297","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Painting and photography are growing with the advancement of technology and globalization. Painting and photography techniques are also developing along with the times. The art of painting is growing, marked by the increasing number of artists, especially in the realism genre. Many artists compete to create painting that is very similar to the original, making it difficult to tell the difference between a hand-drawn painting and a photo taken by a camera. Human limitations in distinguishing the two things need to be overcome with a system that is able to classify them automatically. We try to build a model for image classification, with the hope that the best model is able to classify which are photos and which are images. The best model is expected to be able to overcome human weaknesses in classifying which are photos and which are images. We compared three transfer learning architectures, namely the MobileNet-V1 architecture, the VGG-19 architecture, and the Xception architecture to find out which transfer learning architecture is the best for classifying the two classes, we choose several transfer learning architectural models that have been proven in previous studies to classify images with excellent result. After conducting and evaluating a series of experiments on each CNN model, the best model obtained for classifying images into painting or photo classes in this study is the Xception model trained with a dropout rate value of 0.5 which managed to gain a validation accuracy of 92.59% and test accuracy of 93.52%. The difference between the two values does not have much difference which indicates the model is not overfitting and also the other metrics score of the Xception model showing excellent result
CNN建筑关于区分艺术和照片的比较
随着科技和全球化的进步,绘画和摄影也在不断发展。绘画和摄影技术也随着时代而发展。绘画艺术正在发展,其标志是越来越多的艺术家,特别是在现实主义流派。许多艺术家竞相创作与原作非常相似的画作,这使得很难区分手绘画作和相机拍摄的照片。人类在区分这两种事物方面的局限性需要通过能够自动分类它们的系统来克服。我们尝试建立一个图像分类的模型,希望最好的模型能够区分哪些是照片,哪些是图像。最好的模型有望克服人类在区分哪些是照片,哪些是图像方面的弱点。我们比较了三种迁移学习架构,即MobileNet-V1架构,VGG-19架构和Xception架构,以找出哪种迁移学习架构最适合对这两类进行分类,我们选择了几个在之前的研究中被证明的迁移学习架构模型来对图像进行分类,并取得了很好的效果。在对每个CNN模型进行了一系列实验并进行了评估后,本研究得到的将图像分类为绘画类或照片类的最佳模型是dropout率为0.5的Xception模型,该模型的验证准确率为92.59%,测试准确率为93.52%。两个值之间的差值没有太大差异,这表明模型没有过拟合,并且Xception模型的其他指标得分也显示出很好的结果
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信