Rewriting the Past to Right the Present

Tessa Di Vizio
{"title":"Rewriting the Past to Right the Present","authors":"Tessa Di Vizio","doi":"10.24908/lhps.v1i1.15555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, I argue that the current Hungarian and Polish governments—Fidesz and the Law and Justice (PiS) parties, respectively—engage in historical revisionism to legitimize their illiberal regimes. They act as “mnemonic warriors” by mobilizing, or weaponizing, history for their political gain. They rebuke international criticism of their democratic backsliding, erosion of the rule of law, and media censorship by emphasizing their role as defenders of the nation. Specifically, Viktor Orbán and Jarosław Kaczyński seek legitimacy by grounding their historical interpretations in wartime resistance movements. They continually praise these wartime figures for fighting valiantly to defend their nations from foreign attacks and try to position themselves as their successors, striving to extend these historical narratives of heroism and struggle to their current fight against European Union elites, who criticize their democratic backsliding and illiberalism. In this paper, I will discuss how Orbán and Kaczyński try to revise the official and popular memory of their nations’ experiences in both the Second World War and Revolutions of 1989. I analyze specific monuments, museums, and laws implemented by each regime and compare and contrast their historical revisionism efforts—namely, victimization in Hungary and heroism in Poland—within their current political context to show how they mobilize their historical narratives in their fight against EU elites.","PeriodicalId":118026,"journal":{"name":"Living Histories: A Past Studies Journal","volume":"36 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Living Histories: A Past Studies Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24908/lhps.v1i1.15555","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, I argue that the current Hungarian and Polish governments—Fidesz and the Law and Justice (PiS) parties, respectively—engage in historical revisionism to legitimize their illiberal regimes. They act as “mnemonic warriors” by mobilizing, or weaponizing, history for their political gain. They rebuke international criticism of their democratic backsliding, erosion of the rule of law, and media censorship by emphasizing their role as defenders of the nation. Specifically, Viktor Orbán and Jarosław Kaczyński seek legitimacy by grounding their historical interpretations in wartime resistance movements. They continually praise these wartime figures for fighting valiantly to defend their nations from foreign attacks and try to position themselves as their successors, striving to extend these historical narratives of heroism and struggle to their current fight against European Union elites, who criticize their democratic backsliding and illiberalism. In this paper, I will discuss how Orbán and Kaczyński try to revise the official and popular memory of their nations’ experiences in both the Second World War and Revolutions of 1989. I analyze specific monuments, museums, and laws implemented by each regime and compare and contrast their historical revisionism efforts—namely, victimization in Hungary and heroism in Poland—within their current political context to show how they mobilize their historical narratives in their fight against EU elites.
改写过去,纠正现在
在本文中,我认为当前的匈牙利和波兰政府——分别是青民盟和法律与正义党(PiS)——从事历史修正主义,以使其不自由的政权合法化。他们充当“助记战士”,为自己的政治利益动员或武器化历史。他们通过强调他们作为国家捍卫者的角色,驳斥了国际社会对他们民主倒退、法治侵蚀和媒体审查的批评。具体来说,维克多Orbán和Jarosław Kaczyński通过在战时抵抗运动中建立他们的历史解释来寻求合法性。他们不断赞扬这些战时人物为保卫自己的国家免受外国攻击而英勇战斗,并试图将自己定位为他们的继任者,努力将这些英雄主义和斗争的历史叙述延伸到他们目前与欧盟精英的斗争中,后者批评他们的民主倒退和非自由主义。在本文中,我将讨论Orbán和Kaczyński如何试图修正官方和大众对其国家在第二次世界大战和1989年革命中的经历的记忆。我分析了每个政权实施的具体纪念碑、博物馆和法律,并比较和对比了他们在当前政治背景下的历史修正主义努力——即匈牙利的受害者和波兰的英雄主义——以展示他们如何在与欧盟精英的斗争中动员他们的历史叙事。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信