Sensory Attributes of Jackfruit beyond Meat Sandwich Filling

F. Uruakpa, Ruchithri Nanayakkara, Lauren Pavel, Tessa Robinett
{"title":"Sensory Attributes of Jackfruit beyond Meat Sandwich Filling","authors":"F. Uruakpa, Ruchithri Nanayakkara, Lauren Pavel, Tessa Robinett","doi":"10.37899/journallalifesci.v2i4.451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Jackfruit is used as a meat substitute by some consumers but reports on its use are scanty. Jackfruit is becoming popular among meat lovers who want non-soy-based meat alternative. Thus, this study aims to 1) discover a healthy and affordable option to meat and 2) assess if consumers candifferentiate between pulled pork and jackfruit in a sandwich. Three types of sandwiches were prepared (i.e., jackfruit-in-water; pork tenderloin; jackfruit-inbrine). Sensory analysis using 300 untrained panelists was conducted to examine selected quality attributes (flavor, texture, aroma) and identify the meat-based sample. Panelists scored the sandwiches on a scale of 1-3 with 1 being most favored. The mean scores were calculated as follows: pork = 1.54), jackfruit in brine = 2.16), and Jackfruit in water = 2.18. Statistical analysis (2 tailed T-test) found a significant difference (p = 0.003) in flavor between thepork sandwich (score = 1.6) and those of jackfruit in brine (score = 2.17) and water (score = 2.17). There was a significant difference (p = 0.05) in the texture of pork sandwich (score = 1.6) and jackfruit sandwich in brine (score = 2.0) and water (score = 2.3). Most tasters thought the jackfruit was a meat product although the meat product was ultimately favored. Participants did not know that the sandwiches had a meat substitute. Jackfruit could be a desirable meat substitute for consumers who are looking for low-fat meat alternative rich in antioxidants to add to meals.","PeriodicalId":102565,"journal":{"name":"Journal La Lifesci","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal La Lifesci","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37899/journallalifesci.v2i4.451","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Jackfruit is used as a meat substitute by some consumers but reports on its use are scanty. Jackfruit is becoming popular among meat lovers who want non-soy-based meat alternative. Thus, this study aims to 1) discover a healthy and affordable option to meat and 2) assess if consumers candifferentiate between pulled pork and jackfruit in a sandwich. Three types of sandwiches were prepared (i.e., jackfruit-in-water; pork tenderloin; jackfruit-inbrine). Sensory analysis using 300 untrained panelists was conducted to examine selected quality attributes (flavor, texture, aroma) and identify the meat-based sample. Panelists scored the sandwiches on a scale of 1-3 with 1 being most favored. The mean scores were calculated as follows: pork = 1.54), jackfruit in brine = 2.16), and Jackfruit in water = 2.18. Statistical analysis (2 tailed T-test) found a significant difference (p = 0.003) in flavor between thepork sandwich (score = 1.6) and those of jackfruit in brine (score = 2.17) and water (score = 2.17). There was a significant difference (p = 0.05) in the texture of pork sandwich (score = 1.6) and jackfruit sandwich in brine (score = 2.0) and water (score = 2.3). Most tasters thought the jackfruit was a meat product although the meat product was ultimately favored. Participants did not know that the sandwiches had a meat substitute. Jackfruit could be a desirable meat substitute for consumers who are looking for low-fat meat alternative rich in antioxidants to add to meals.
菠萝蜜在肉类三明治馅料之外的感官属性
菠萝蜜被一些消费者用作肉类替代品,但有关其使用的报道很少。菠萝蜜在那些想要非大豆基肉类替代品的肉类爱好者中越来越受欢迎。因此,这项研究的目的是:1)发现一种健康且负担得起的肉类选择;2)评估消费者是否能区分三明治中的猪肉和菠萝蜜。准备了三种类型的三明治(即,水中菠萝蜜;猪肉里脊;jackfruit-inbrine)。使用300名未经培训的小组成员进行感官分析,以检查选定的质量属性(风味,质地,香气)并识别基于肉类的样品。小组成员对三明治进行了1-3分的评分,1分是最喜欢的。平均得分计算如下:猪肉= 1.54),盐水菠萝蜜= 2.16),水菠萝蜜= 2.18。统计分析(双尾t检验)发现,猪肉三明治(得分= 1.6)与菠萝蜜在盐水(得分= 2.17)和水中(得分= 2.17)的风味差异显著(p = 0.003)。猪肉三明治(得分= 1.6)和菠萝蜜三明治在盐水(得分= 2.0)和水中(得分= 2.3)中的质地差异有统计学意义(p = 0.05)。大多数品尝者认为菠萝蜜是一种肉制品,尽管肉制品最终受到青睐。参与者并不知道三明治中含有肉类替代品。对于那些正在寻找富含抗氧化剂的低脂肉类替代品的消费者来说,菠萝蜜可能是一种理想的肉类替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信