Risk Control Through Evaluation of Catastrophic Scenarios

Amórtegui Gil, J. Vicente
{"title":"Risk Control Through Evaluation of Catastrophic Scenarios","authors":"Amórtegui Gil, J. Vicente","doi":"10.1115/ipg2019-5312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In sectors where pipelines cross areas exposed to severe hazards or where the consequences are serious, traditional analyses based on the Risk Analysis Matrix (RAM) do not reflect the effect of the works and actions taken for risk control. That condition induces the idea of ineffectiveness or uselessness of the works and actions taken for protection and reinforcement. In this paper, for those situations it is proposed the analysis of hypothetical scenarios to determine which of them can become catastrophic, in order to assess which situations can trigger a catastrophe, and in consequence to take actions regarding them and thus to avoid the catastrophic situation.\n The suggested method consists in proposing scenarios of damages, corresponding an event of loss of product containment of a hydrocarbon transport system. In those scenarios, the following consequences of the oil spill are determined: the behaviour of the product, its route, the site of rupture, the possible threats that affect it, and the triggers of the threatening processes.\n Critical or catastrophic scenarios are selected and the chain of events regarding them is determined as detailed as possible. When analysing that chain, it is possible to find actions that may modify it, such as the control of the route so that it does not reach the sensitive elements, the strengthening of the pipeline to bear the hazards, the reinforcement of the ground to prevent the action of the hazards and to avoid that the hazard takes place.\n It must be determined how to protect the exposed elements and how to handle the spilled product to avoid the affectation of the elements mentioned above. For this point, it is important to know the infrastructure of the Contingency Plan and therefore to evaluate the possibility of strengthening it.","PeriodicalId":325632,"journal":{"name":"ASME-ARPEL 2019 International Pipeline Geotechnical Conference","volume":"86 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASME-ARPEL 2019 International Pipeline Geotechnical Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/ipg2019-5312","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In sectors where pipelines cross areas exposed to severe hazards or where the consequences are serious, traditional analyses based on the Risk Analysis Matrix (RAM) do not reflect the effect of the works and actions taken for risk control. That condition induces the idea of ineffectiveness or uselessness of the works and actions taken for protection and reinforcement. In this paper, for those situations it is proposed the analysis of hypothetical scenarios to determine which of them can become catastrophic, in order to assess which situations can trigger a catastrophe, and in consequence to take actions regarding them and thus to avoid the catastrophic situation. The suggested method consists in proposing scenarios of damages, corresponding an event of loss of product containment of a hydrocarbon transport system. In those scenarios, the following consequences of the oil spill are determined: the behaviour of the product, its route, the site of rupture, the possible threats that affect it, and the triggers of the threatening processes. Critical or catastrophic scenarios are selected and the chain of events regarding them is determined as detailed as possible. When analysing that chain, it is possible to find actions that may modify it, such as the control of the route so that it does not reach the sensitive elements, the strengthening of the pipeline to bear the hazards, the reinforcement of the ground to prevent the action of the hazards and to avoid that the hazard takes place. It must be determined how to protect the exposed elements and how to handle the spilled product to avoid the affectation of the elements mentioned above. For this point, it is important to know the infrastructure of the Contingency Plan and therefore to evaluate the possibility of strengthening it.
基于灾难性情景评估的风险控制
在管道跨越暴露于严重危害或后果严重的区域的部门,基于风险分析矩阵(RAM)的传统分析不能反映工程的效果和采取的风险控制措施。这种情况导致人们认为为保护和加固而采取的工程和行动是无效或无用的。在本文中,对于这些情况,提出了假设情景的分析,以确定其中哪些情况可能成为灾难性的,以评估哪些情况可能引发灾难,并因此采取行动,从而避免灾难性的情况。建议的方法包括提出损害情景,对应于烃类运输系统的产品容器损失的事件。在这些情况下,石油泄漏的下列后果是确定的:产品的行为,其路线,破裂地点,可能影响它的威胁,以及威胁过程的触发因素。选择关键或灾难性的场景,并尽可能详细地确定与之相关的事件链。在分析这个链条时,有可能找到可能改变它的行动,例如控制路线使其不到达敏感元件,加强管道以承受危险,加固地面以防止危险的作用并避免危险的发生。必须确定如何保护暴露的元素,以及如何处理溢出的产品,以避免上述元素的影响。在这一点上,重要的是要了解应急计划的基础设施,从而评估加强它的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信