Securitization of Cross-border Population Movements

Tasneem Tasneem Siddiqui
{"title":"Securitization of Cross-border Population Movements","authors":"Tasneem Tasneem Siddiqui","doi":"10.57074/rtyi6923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines three examples of the securitization of cross-border population movements within a few selected countries of South and South East Asia. These cases include: a) the forced movement of the Rohingya population form Myanmar to Bangladesh; b) the movement of the Bengali population from Bangladesh and West Bengal to the Assam State of India; and c) the labour migration between India and Bangladesh. It employs Barry Buzan’s ‘Non- Traditional Security’ and ‘Securitisation’ framework. It first identifies why these destination countries have securitized migration, then locates the process through which states, as well as political parties, student groups, and several other sections of the civil society of the destination countries, have securitized migration through different types of ‘speech acts.’ The paper demonstrates that securitization failed to resolve the challenges thrown up by the forced and voluntary population movements between these countries. Rather, it severely compromised the human security of those men, women and children who were forced to move or voluntarily engage in labour migration.","PeriodicalId":185999,"journal":{"name":"Bangladesh Political Science Review","volume":"210 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bangladesh Political Science Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.57074/rtyi6923","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines three examples of the securitization of cross-border population movements within a few selected countries of South and South East Asia. These cases include: a) the forced movement of the Rohingya population form Myanmar to Bangladesh; b) the movement of the Bengali population from Bangladesh and West Bengal to the Assam State of India; and c) the labour migration between India and Bangladesh. It employs Barry Buzan’s ‘Non- Traditional Security’ and ‘Securitisation’ framework. It first identifies why these destination countries have securitized migration, then locates the process through which states, as well as political parties, student groups, and several other sections of the civil society of the destination countries, have securitized migration through different types of ‘speech acts.’ The paper demonstrates that securitization failed to resolve the challenges thrown up by the forced and voluntary population movements between these countries. Rather, it severely compromised the human security of those men, women and children who were forced to move or voluntarily engage in labour migration.
人口跨境流动的证券化
本文考察了南亚和东南亚几个选定国家内跨境人口流动证券化的三个例子。这些案例包括:a)罗兴亚人口从缅甸被迫迁移到孟加拉国;b)孟加拉人口从孟加拉国和西孟加拉邦迁移到印度阿萨姆邦;c)印度和孟加拉国之间的劳动力迁移。它采用了巴里·布赞的“非传统安全”和“证券化”框架。它首先确定了这些目的国将移民证券化的原因,然后定位了国家、政党、学生团体和目的国公民社会的其他几个部分通过不同类型的“言论行为”将移民证券化的过程。这篇论文表明,证券化未能解决这些国家之间被迫和自愿的人口流动所带来的挑战。相反,它严重损害了那些被迫移徙或自愿从事劳工移徙的男子、妇女和儿童的人身安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信