Battle of Kircholm (Salaspils) in 1605. The current state of research

Mariusz Balcerek
{"title":"Battle of Kircholm (Salaspils) in 1605. The current state of research","authors":"Mariusz Balcerek","doi":"10.1515/openms-2020-0116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background: The article aims to present the state of research on the Battle of Kircholm (Salaspils), which took place in Livonia (now Latvia) on September 27, 1605., between the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth and Sweden. 74% of Swedes were killed, and the winners lost only 3% of their forces. It was an absolute massacre carried out by an army consisting in two-thirds of cavalry against an enemy with an advantage in infantry and artillery, which in theory is more modern. Methodology: The author has analyzed the known and unknown historiography of sources, including archaeological, epistolary, historiographic, iconographic, narrative, and normative materials. He compared the results with previous literature on the subject. Principal Findings/Results: The analysis conducted showed a brilliant tactic by the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth’s army, consisting of combining cavalry with infantry. This, along with many errors in command of the Swedish army, led to the downfall of the Scandinavians. Conclusions/Significances: The success at Kircholm saved the Polish-Lithuanian rule over the Daugava River. Unfortunately, it cemented Polish-Lithuanian nobility in the mistaken belief about the power of the army of the Republic, that without money and reforms, they began to lose advantage over opponents.","PeriodicalId":222716,"journal":{"name":"Open Military Studies","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Military Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/openms-2020-0116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background: The article aims to present the state of research on the Battle of Kircholm (Salaspils), which took place in Livonia (now Latvia) on September 27, 1605., between the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth and Sweden. 74% of Swedes were killed, and the winners lost only 3% of their forces. It was an absolute massacre carried out by an army consisting in two-thirds of cavalry against an enemy with an advantage in infantry and artillery, which in theory is more modern. Methodology: The author has analyzed the known and unknown historiography of sources, including archaeological, epistolary, historiographic, iconographic, narrative, and normative materials. He compared the results with previous literature on the subject. Principal Findings/Results: The analysis conducted showed a brilliant tactic by the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth’s army, consisting of combining cavalry with infantry. This, along with many errors in command of the Swedish army, led to the downfall of the Scandinavians. Conclusions/Significances: The success at Kircholm saved the Polish-Lithuanian rule over the Daugava River. Unfortunately, it cemented Polish-Lithuanian nobility in the mistaken belief about the power of the army of the Republic, that without money and reforms, they began to lose advantage over opponents.
1605年的Kircholm (Salaspils)战役。研究的现状
摘要背景:本文旨在介绍1605年9月27日发生在利沃尼亚(现拉脱维亚)的Kircholm (Salaspils)战役的研究现状。在波兰立陶宛联邦和瑞典之间的战争中,74%的瑞典人阵亡,而胜利者只损失了3%的兵力。这是一场绝对的大屠杀,由三分之二的骑兵组成的军队对理论上更现代的步兵和炮兵优势的敌人进行了屠杀。方法:作者分析了已知和未知的史料来源,包括考古、书信、历史、图像、叙事和规范材料。他将研究结果与先前有关该主题的文献进行了比较。主要发现/结果:所进行的分析显示波兰立陶宛联邦军队采用了一种出色的战术,即骑兵与步兵相结合。这一点,加上瑞典军队指挥上的许多错误,导致了斯堪的纳维亚人的垮台。结论/意义:Kircholm战役的成功挽救了波兰-立陶宛对道加瓦河的统治。不幸的是,它巩固了波兰立陶宛贵族对共和国军队力量的错误信念,没有资金和改革,他们开始失去对对手的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信