Efficiency of continuous double auctions in the electricity market

Alexander Weber, S. Schroder
{"title":"Efficiency of continuous double auctions in the electricity market","authors":"Alexander Weber, S. Schroder","doi":"10.1109/EEM.2011.5952987","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Intra-day electricity markets are considered as important mechanisms to reconcile short-term fluctuations of energy production with consumption. This even gains in significance in systems with heavy intermittent production at virtually no variable costs, such as wind energy. In Europe, intra-day markets are often designed as continuous double auctions where bid and ask orders are collected continuously, ranked by price and time of arrival. Although this market type can be considered as delivering more or less efficient results, the trading process itself is time-consuming. This poses the question whether continuous markets yield comparably good results when flexibility of market participants to change their schedules at short notice is costlier than having changed them earlier. We apply an extended zero-intelligent-trader simulation model to assess the impact of costly flexibility on market outcomes. We find that costly flexibility with a correspondig demand for flexibility may negatively affect the efficiency of continuous double auctions. For the energy market, this could imply that the markets' ability to exploit flexibility is systematically limited.","PeriodicalId":143375,"journal":{"name":"2011 8th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM)","volume":"367 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 8th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EEM.2011.5952987","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Intra-day electricity markets are considered as important mechanisms to reconcile short-term fluctuations of energy production with consumption. This even gains in significance in systems with heavy intermittent production at virtually no variable costs, such as wind energy. In Europe, intra-day markets are often designed as continuous double auctions where bid and ask orders are collected continuously, ranked by price and time of arrival. Although this market type can be considered as delivering more or less efficient results, the trading process itself is time-consuming. This poses the question whether continuous markets yield comparably good results when flexibility of market participants to change their schedules at short notice is costlier than having changed them earlier. We apply an extended zero-intelligent-trader simulation model to assess the impact of costly flexibility on market outcomes. We find that costly flexibility with a correspondig demand for flexibility may negatively affect the efficiency of continuous double auctions. For the energy market, this could imply that the markets' ability to exploit flexibility is systematically limited.
电力市场连续双重拍卖的效率
日间电力市场被认为是调和能源生产与消费短期波动的重要机制。这甚至在几乎没有可变成本的大量间歇性生产系统(如风能)中也具有重要意义。在欧洲,日内交易市场通常被设计成连续的双重拍卖,买卖指令按价格和到达时间连续收集。尽管这种市场类型可以被认为提供或多或少有效的结果,但交易过程本身是耗时的。这就提出了一个问题,当市场参与者在短时间内改变时间表的灵活性比提前改变时间表的成本更高时,连续市场是否会产生相对较好的结果?我们应用一个扩展的零智能交易者模拟模型来评估昂贵的灵活性对市场结果的影响。我们发现,具有相应灵活性需求的昂贵灵活性可能会对连续双重拍卖的效率产生负向影响。对于能源市场来说,这可能意味着市场利用灵活性的能力受到了系统性的限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信