Przed wyjazdem do Stambułu. Kilka uwag na temat przygotowania misji Stanisława Chomentowskiego, wojewody mazowieckiego, do Porty Ottomańskiej w 1712 roku

Adam Perłakowski
{"title":"Przed wyjazdem do Stambułu. Kilka uwag na temat przygotowania misji Stanisława Chomentowskiego, wojewody mazowieckiego, do Porty Ottomańskiej w 1712 roku","authors":"Adam Perłakowski","doi":"10.18778/8220-090-4.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of Stanisław Chomentowski’s mission as the Grand Ambassador to the Sublime Porte in 1712–1714 was to confirm the terms of the Treaty of Karlowitz, signed in 1699, and to reduce the political tension between the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth and Turkey, which in late 1712 and throughout almost entire 1713 even threatened to erupt in an armed conflict between the two states. Considering the course of the mission, the difficulties in completing it, and even the temporary restriction of the Polish diplomat’s freedom on the territory of the Ottoman state, its results should be regarded as definitely positive. Chomentowski’s visit to Turkey, where he was supported by Augustus II’s other diplomats, Franciszek Goltz (starosta of Śrem) and Jan Spiegel, resulted in averting the Turkish threat and renewing the terms of the Treaty of Karlowitz. The three missions, conducted by Chomentowski, Spiegel and Goltz, should be studied in the context of Augustus II’s one large-scale diplomatic action, which ended successfully. It also proves that the work of the Polish diplomatic service in the times of the kings from the House of Wettin, about which historians, paradoxically, do not have a very high opinion to this day, was actually quite effective.","PeriodicalId":375902,"journal":{"name":"Władza i polityka w czasach nowożytnych. Dyplomacja i sprawy wewnętrzne","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Władza i polityka w czasach nowożytnych. Dyplomacja i sprawy wewnętrzne","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18778/8220-090-4.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of Stanisław Chomentowski’s mission as the Grand Ambassador to the Sublime Porte in 1712–1714 was to confirm the terms of the Treaty of Karlowitz, signed in 1699, and to reduce the political tension between the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth and Turkey, which in late 1712 and throughout almost entire 1713 even threatened to erupt in an armed conflict between the two states. Considering the course of the mission, the difficulties in completing it, and even the temporary restriction of the Polish diplomat’s freedom on the territory of the Ottoman state, its results should be regarded as definitely positive. Chomentowski’s visit to Turkey, where he was supported by Augustus II’s other diplomats, Franciszek Goltz (starosta of Śrem) and Jan Spiegel, resulted in averting the Turkish threat and renewing the terms of the Treaty of Karlowitz. The three missions, conducted by Chomentowski, Spiegel and Goltz, should be studied in the context of Augustus II’s one large-scale diplomatic action, which ended successfully. It also proves that the work of the Polish diplomatic service in the times of the kings from the House of Wettin, about which historians, paradoxically, do not have a very high opinion to this day, was actually quite effective.
Stanisław Chomentowski作为1712年至1714年驻波兰大使的使命是确认1699年签署的《卡洛维茨条约》的条款,并减少波兰立陶宛联邦和土耳其之间的政治紧张局势,这种紧张局势在1712年末和几乎整个1713年期间甚至威胁要爆发两国之间的武装冲突。考虑到任务的过程,完成任务的困难,甚至暂时限制了波兰外交官在奥斯曼帝国领土上的自由,其结果应该被视为肯定是积极的。在奥古斯都二世的其他外交官Franciszek Goltz (starosta of Śrem)和Jan Spiegel的支持下,Chomentowski访问了土耳其,避免了土耳其的威胁,并延长了《卡洛维茨条约》的条款。Chomentowski、Spiegel和Goltz的这三次任务应该放在奥古斯都二世一次成功结束的大规模外交行动的背景下进行研究。这也证明了波兰外交部门在维廷王朝时期的工作是非常有效的,尽管历史学家们直到今天都没有给予很高的评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信