Commit to a Credible Path of Rising CO2 Prices

Stan Olijslagers, Rick van der Ploeg, Sweder J. G. van Wijnbergen
{"title":"Commit to a Credible Path of Rising CO2 Prices","authors":"Stan Olijslagers, Rick van der Ploeg, Sweder J. G. van Wijnbergen","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3613564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"CO2 pricing is essential for an efficient transition to the green economy. Despite Daniel, Litterman and Wagner (2019)’ claim that CO2 prices should decline, CO2 prices should rise over time. First, damages from global warming are proportional to economic activity and this makes CO2 prices grow at the same rate as the economy. Second, even if uncertainty about the damage ratio is gradually resolved over time, this only slows down the price rise. Third, if CCS is allowed for, the optimal CO2 price will rise before it declines but this decline does not occur until more than two centuries ahead. Fourth, damages are likely to be a very convex function of temperature which with rising temperature implies that CO2 prices must grow faster than the economy. Fifth, internalizing the social benefits of learning by doing or a shift towards technical progress in renewable energy production requires a subsidy for renewable energy, not a temporary spike in CO2 prices. Having high CO2 prices upfront is an artefact of failing to separate out renewable energy subsidies from the carbon price. Finally, efficient intertemporal allocation of policy efforts implies that a temperature cap or cap on cumulative emissions requires that CO2 prices must rise at a rate equal to the risk-adjusted interest rate, typically higher than the economic growth rate. Summing up, CO2 prices must rise at a rate at least equal to the economic growth rate and at most to the risk-adjusted interest rate. They should not decline.","PeriodicalId":403294,"journal":{"name":"CEPR: Macroeconomics & Growth (Topic)","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CEPR: Macroeconomics & Growth (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3613564","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

CO2 pricing is essential for an efficient transition to the green economy. Despite Daniel, Litterman and Wagner (2019)’ claim that CO2 prices should decline, CO2 prices should rise over time. First, damages from global warming are proportional to economic activity and this makes CO2 prices grow at the same rate as the economy. Second, even if uncertainty about the damage ratio is gradually resolved over time, this only slows down the price rise. Third, if CCS is allowed for, the optimal CO2 price will rise before it declines but this decline does not occur until more than two centuries ahead. Fourth, damages are likely to be a very convex function of temperature which with rising temperature implies that CO2 prices must grow faster than the economy. Fifth, internalizing the social benefits of learning by doing or a shift towards technical progress in renewable energy production requires a subsidy for renewable energy, not a temporary spike in CO2 prices. Having high CO2 prices upfront is an artefact of failing to separate out renewable energy subsidies from the carbon price. Finally, efficient intertemporal allocation of policy efforts implies that a temperature cap or cap on cumulative emissions requires that CO2 prices must rise at a rate equal to the risk-adjusted interest rate, typically higher than the economic growth rate. Summing up, CO2 prices must rise at a rate at least equal to the economic growth rate and at most to the risk-adjusted interest rate. They should not decline.
致力于二氧化碳价格上涨的可靠途径
二氧化碳定价对于向绿色经济的有效过渡至关重要。尽管Daniel、Litterman和Wagner (2019) 声称二氧化碳价格应该下降,但二氧化碳价格应该随着时间的推移而上升。首先,全球变暖造成的损害与经济活动成正比,这使得二氧化碳价格与经济增长速度相同。其次,即使伤害比的不确定性随着时间的推移逐渐得到解决,这也只会减缓价格的上涨。第三,如果考虑到CCS,最优的二氧化碳价格将在下降之前上升,但这种下降要到两个多世纪以后才会发生。第四,损害可能是温度的一个非常凸函数,随着温度的上升,这意味着二氧化碳价格的增长必须快于经济增长。第五,将实践中学习的社会效益内在化,或向可再生能源生产技术进步转变,需要对可再生能源提供补贴,而不是暂时提高二氧化碳价格。预先设定高二氧化碳价格是未能将可再生能源补贴与碳价格分开的产物。最后,有效的跨期政策分配意味着,温度上限或累积排放上限要求二氧化碳价格必须以与风险调整后的利率相等的速度上升,通常高于经济增长率。总而言之,二氧化碳价格的上涨速度必须至少等于经济增长率,最多等于经风险调整后的利率。他们不应该拒绝。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信