Exploring the Knowledge Structure of Research on College Students’ Creativity Through Keyword Network Analysis: A Context-Specific Approach

Donggun An
{"title":"Exploring the Knowledge Structure of Research on College Students’ Creativity Through Keyword Network Analysis: A Context-Specific Approach","authors":"Donggun An","doi":"10.36358/jce.2023.23.2.63","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to investigate the knowledge structure of research on college students’ creativity from a context-specific perspective and suggest a future direction for the studies. A total of 579 keywords were selected from 242 research papers in South Korea during the past 20 years from 2003 to 2022 that considered college students’ creativity. Then, a total of 54 keywords represented more than three times among them were analyzed using keyword network analysis including centrality analysis, and community analysis. The results showed that the keywords with high degree centrality were creativity, college students, everyday creativity, creative problem solving and so on. The keywords with high betweenness centrality were creativity, college students, everyday creativity, creative problem solving, creative character, and so on. In the results of community analysis, four sub-groups were formed focusing on everyday creativity (creative character, learning flow, creative self-efficacy, creative thinking, and career maturity), college students (creative character education, character, creative ability, core competence, and creative education), creative problem solving (problem solving, creative tendency, empathy, learning motivation, and creativity competency), and creativity (creativity convergence competency, creative leadership, self-efficacy, nursing students, and creative competency). There were differences in context-specific (academic, career developmental, educational, social, and everyday) factors of creativity that each sub-group was mainly dealing with. Theoretical and practical implications and future directions were also discussed.","PeriodicalId":186018,"journal":{"name":"Korean Society for Creativity Education","volume":"115 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Society for Creativity Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36358/jce.2023.23.2.63","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the knowledge structure of research on college students’ creativity from a context-specific perspective and suggest a future direction for the studies. A total of 579 keywords were selected from 242 research papers in South Korea during the past 20 years from 2003 to 2022 that considered college students’ creativity. Then, a total of 54 keywords represented more than three times among them were analyzed using keyword network analysis including centrality analysis, and community analysis. The results showed that the keywords with high degree centrality were creativity, college students, everyday creativity, creative problem solving and so on. The keywords with high betweenness centrality were creativity, college students, everyday creativity, creative problem solving, creative character, and so on. In the results of community analysis, four sub-groups were formed focusing on everyday creativity (creative character, learning flow, creative self-efficacy, creative thinking, and career maturity), college students (creative character education, character, creative ability, core competence, and creative education), creative problem solving (problem solving, creative tendency, empathy, learning motivation, and creativity competency), and creativity (creativity convergence competency, creative leadership, self-efficacy, nursing students, and creative competency). There were differences in context-specific (academic, career developmental, educational, social, and everyday) factors of creativity that each sub-group was mainly dealing with. Theoretical and practical implications and future directions were also discussed.
基于关键词网络分析的大学生创造力研究的知识结构:一种情境分析方法
本研究旨在从情境视角探讨大学生创造力研究的知识结构,并提出未来研究的方向。从韩国2003年至2022年的20年间的242篇研究论文中,选取了579个与大学生创造力相关的关键词。然后,利用关键词网络分析,包括中心性分析和社区分析,对其中代表3次以上的54个关键词进行分析。结果表明,中心性较高的关键词有创造力、大学生、日常创造力、创造性解决问题等。中间性中心性较高的关键词有创造力、大学生、日常创造力、创造性解决问题、创造性性格等。在社区分析结果中,以日常创造力(创造性性格、学习流程、创造性自我效能感、创造性思维、职业成熟度)、大学生创造力(创造性性格教育、个性、创造性能力、核心竞争力、创造性教育)、创造性解决问题(解决问题、创造性倾向、移情、学习动机、创造性能力)和创造力(创造力趋同能力)为重点,形成了四个子群体。创造性领导、自我效能感、护理学生和创造性能力)。各亚组主要处理的创造力因素在特定情境(学术、职业发展、教育、社会和日常)方面存在差异。讨论了理论和实践意义及未来发展方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信