Student Perceptions of an Asychronous Online Discussion Board Used to Assess the Professional Skills

M. Danaher, A. Rhodes, Ashley Ater-Kranov
{"title":"Student Perceptions of an Asychronous Online Discussion Board Used to Assess the Professional Skills","authors":"M. Danaher, A. Rhodes, Ashley Ater-Kranov","doi":"10.1109/EDUCON46332.2021.9453886","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Though not originally developed for teaching, asynchronous online discussion boards (AODBs) have become important tools for online and blended learning, while also having expanded into some face-to-face teaching environments. Because of this, it is imperative that ongoing research is conducted into how they can be integrated in courses, how they are perceived by students, and how they operate when used as assessments. This paper examines student perceptions of a particular AODB activity, the Computing Professional Skills Assessment (CPSA). The professional skills are the 21st century, cross-disciplinary, or transferable learning outcomes including but not limited to problem-solving, communication, teamwork, and critical thinking, and they are globally recognized as essential for employment within a knowledge economy. Utilizing the CPSA as a direct assessment within a traditional face-to-face course, through an anonymous survey students provide their insights into the degree to which the AODB enhanced professional skills learning outcomes and shared what they liked, disliked, and would like to change about the AODB.","PeriodicalId":178923,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON)","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON46332.2021.9453886","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Though not originally developed for teaching, asynchronous online discussion boards (AODBs) have become important tools for online and blended learning, while also having expanded into some face-to-face teaching environments. Because of this, it is imperative that ongoing research is conducted into how they can be integrated in courses, how they are perceived by students, and how they operate when used as assessments. This paper examines student perceptions of a particular AODB activity, the Computing Professional Skills Assessment (CPSA). The professional skills are the 21st century, cross-disciplinary, or transferable learning outcomes including but not limited to problem-solving, communication, teamwork, and critical thinking, and they are globally recognized as essential for employment within a knowledge economy. Utilizing the CPSA as a direct assessment within a traditional face-to-face course, through an anonymous survey students provide their insights into the degree to which the AODB enhanced professional skills learning outcomes and shared what they liked, disliked, and would like to change about the AODB.
学生对用于评估专业技能的异步在线讨论板的看法
虽然异步在线讨论板(aodb)最初不是为教学开发的,但它已经成为在线和混合学习的重要工具,同时也扩展到一些面对面的教学环境中。正因为如此,有必要进行持续的研究,研究如何将它们整合到课程中,学生如何看待它们,以及它们在用作评估时如何运作。本文考察了学生对AODB特定活动的看法,即计算专业技能评估(CPSA)。专业技能是21世纪,跨学科或可转移的学习成果,包括但不限于解决问题,沟通,团队合作和批判性思维,它们被全球公认为知识经济中就业的必要条件。利用CPSA作为传统面对面课程的直接评估,通过匿名调查,学生们提供了他们对AODB提高专业技能学习成果的程度的见解,并分享了他们对AODB的喜欢,不喜欢和希望改变的地方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信