Testing standards assessment for silicone rubber

N. N. Azmi, S. Noor, Mohd Nor Azmi Ab Patar, J. Mahmud
{"title":"Testing standards assessment for silicone rubber","authors":"N. N. Azmi, S. Noor, Mohd Nor Azmi Ab Patar, J. Mahmud","doi":"10.1109/ISTMET.2014.6936529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Skin biomechanics has become an emerging area in research as its interest covers a wide range of applications such as product design, surgery, animation and materials engineering. Based on literatures, silicone rubber is one of the best candidate materials that exhibit desirable skin characteristics, thus making it the right material for skin substitute. Nonetheless, there is no specific standard that has been used to measure the mechanical properties and deformation behaviour of synthetic skin. This paper for the first time aims to assess two standard testing methods for silicone rubber. The work is carried out in 2 stages involving uniaxial testing and quantifying the material constants using a Matlab programme. Mechanical tests are conducted on 2 types of materials (different grades of silicone rubber) using uniaxial tensile test with two different standards (ASTM D2209 and ASTM D412). The raw testing data (load-extension) are then input into an in-house developed Matlab programme to compute and plot stress-stretch value based on neo-Hookean model. Based on statistical analysis, the testing data is found valid, since the sample variance is found to be less than 1%. The neo-Hookean constants, C1, are found to be 0.7819 (ASTM D2209) and 1.3786 (ASTM D412) for Material 1; and 0.927 (ASTM D2209) and 1.4396 (ASTM D412) for Material 2 revealing a difference of 59.67% and 51.21% for Material 1 and Material 2 respectively. As a conclusion, the significant difference of the quantified Material constants suggests a dedicated testing standard must be used.","PeriodicalId":364834,"journal":{"name":"2014 International Symposium on Technology Management and Emerging Technologies","volume":"156 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 International Symposium on Technology Management and Emerging Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISTMET.2014.6936529","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Skin biomechanics has become an emerging area in research as its interest covers a wide range of applications such as product design, surgery, animation and materials engineering. Based on literatures, silicone rubber is one of the best candidate materials that exhibit desirable skin characteristics, thus making it the right material for skin substitute. Nonetheless, there is no specific standard that has been used to measure the mechanical properties and deformation behaviour of synthetic skin. This paper for the first time aims to assess two standard testing methods for silicone rubber. The work is carried out in 2 stages involving uniaxial testing and quantifying the material constants using a Matlab programme. Mechanical tests are conducted on 2 types of materials (different grades of silicone rubber) using uniaxial tensile test with two different standards (ASTM D2209 and ASTM D412). The raw testing data (load-extension) are then input into an in-house developed Matlab programme to compute and plot stress-stretch value based on neo-Hookean model. Based on statistical analysis, the testing data is found valid, since the sample variance is found to be less than 1%. The neo-Hookean constants, C1, are found to be 0.7819 (ASTM D2209) and 1.3786 (ASTM D412) for Material 1; and 0.927 (ASTM D2209) and 1.4396 (ASTM D412) for Material 2 revealing a difference of 59.67% and 51.21% for Material 1 and Material 2 respectively. As a conclusion, the significant difference of the quantified Material constants suggests a dedicated testing standard must be used.
硅橡胶试验标准评定
皮肤生物力学已经成为一个新兴的研究领域,因为它的兴趣涵盖了产品设计、外科、动画和材料工程等广泛的应用。根据文献,硅橡胶是具有良好皮肤特性的最佳候选材料之一,是皮肤替代品的理想材料。然而,目前还没有专门的标准来测量合成蒙皮的机械性能和变形行为。本文首次对硅橡胶的两种标准测试方法进行了评价。这项工作分两个阶段进行,包括单轴测试和使用Matlab程序量化材料常数。采用两种不同标准(ASTM D2209和ASTM D412)的单轴拉伸试验,对2种材料(不同等级的硅橡胶)进行力学试验。然后将原始测试数据(载荷扩展)输入到内部开发的Matlab程序中,以基于neo-Hookean模型计算和绘制应力-拉伸值。通过统计分析,发现测试数据是有效的,因为样本方差小于1%。材料1的新胡克常数C1分别为0.7819 (ASTM D2209)和1.3786 (ASTM D412);材料2为0.927 (ASTM D2209)和1.4396 (ASTM D412),表明材料1和材料2的差异分别为59.67%和51.21%。综上所述,量化的材料常数差异显著,必须采用专门的测试标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信