“Let the collective intelligence shine through”

Wei Gao
{"title":"“Let the collective intelligence shine through”","authors":"Wei Gao","doi":"10.1080/20517483.2018.1603645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An innovative type of dispute resolution model called crowdsourced online dispute resolution (CODR) has emerged in recent years and has the potential to offer an effective means for resolving disputes arising from online activities. Notable examples of this model are currently used in online opinion pools, online mock juries, and online dispute resolution by private companies. China’s largest e-commerce platform Taobao.com has been testing this innovative approach since 2012. Its CODR system allows its users to sign up as panelists to resolve disputes between buyers and sellers. This paper analyzes how CODR systems can leverage “crowdsourced” approaches to deliver appropriate outcomes, drawing on extensive experience with Taobao’s dispute resolution system, in particular its Public Jury. Given the enormity of Taobao’s market share, such examination could prove instrumental in understanding the strengths and weaknesses of the model.","PeriodicalId":108655,"journal":{"name":"Peking University Law Journal","volume":"192 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Peking University Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20517483.2018.1603645","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An innovative type of dispute resolution model called crowdsourced online dispute resolution (CODR) has emerged in recent years and has the potential to offer an effective means for resolving disputes arising from online activities. Notable examples of this model are currently used in online opinion pools, online mock juries, and online dispute resolution by private companies. China’s largest e-commerce platform Taobao.com has been testing this innovative approach since 2012. Its CODR system allows its users to sign up as panelists to resolve disputes between buyers and sellers. This paper analyzes how CODR systems can leverage “crowdsourced” approaches to deliver appropriate outcomes, drawing on extensive experience with Taobao’s dispute resolution system, in particular its Public Jury. Given the enormity of Taobao’s market share, such examination could prove instrumental in understanding the strengths and weaknesses of the model.
“让集体智慧闪耀”
近年来出现了一种名为众包在线争议解决(CODR)的创新争议解决模式,它有可能为解决在线活动产生的争议提供一种有效手段。这种模式的显著例子目前被用于在线意见池、在线模拟陪审团和私营公司的在线争议解决。自2012年以来,中国最大的电子商务平台淘宝网一直在测试这种创新方法。它的CODR系统允许用户注册成为小组成员,以解决买家和卖家之间的纠纷。本文分析了CODR系统如何利用“众包”方法来提供适当的结果,并借鉴了淘宝争议解决系统,特别是其公共陪审团的丰富经验。鉴于淘宝巨大的市场份额,这样的研究可能有助于理解该模式的优缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信