Improving Students’ Vocabulary Mastery through Teaching Real Objects

Puji Hariati
{"title":"Improving Students’ Vocabulary Mastery through Teaching Real Objects","authors":"Puji Hariati","doi":"10.33258/birle.v3i2.905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was aimed to find out the improvement of the students’ vocabulary mastery through teaching real object. This study was conducted by using Classroom Action Research. It was done through 1) planning, 2) action, 3) observation, and 4) reflection. The population of the research was the students of Amik Medicom. To get the sample, the researcher took one class, it was MI18B. This research applied quantitative and qualitative data. Quantitative method were taken from the students' test. Qualitative data were taken from observation, questionnaires sheet and diary notes. The research found out that there are some improvements of the students’ vocabulary mastery taught by applying real objects. It was proved from the students’ improvement in cycle 1 until cycle 2. The improvement can be seen that in pre test the means score was 34.66. In the first cycle,  meeting 1 the means score was 37,33, in meeting 2 was 47,66 and in meeting 3 was 53,5. In the second cycle, meeting 1 the means score was 68,83,  in meeting 2 was 80,33 and in meeting 3 was 91,66. The improvement also can be seen from the percentage of the students’ achievement in mastering vocabulary; in pre test, no one of the students got 75 points. In the first cycle, in meeting 1, and there no one student got 75 point,  in meeting 3 there was 16.7% (5 students) got 75 points. It means there was an improvement about 16.7 % . In the second cycle, in meeting 1 there was 20% (6 students) got 75 points, it means that there was an improvement about 3.3%. In meeting 2 there was 80% (24 students) got 75 points, it means that there was an improvement about 70%.  In meeting 3 there was 100% (30 students) got up 75 points, it means that there was an improvement about 30%. It means that all of the students got better result. They could master many new vocabulary items and composed them into good sentences. ","PeriodicalId":358928,"journal":{"name":"Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal","volume":"112 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33258/birle.v3i2.905","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This study was aimed to find out the improvement of the students’ vocabulary mastery through teaching real object. This study was conducted by using Classroom Action Research. It was done through 1) planning, 2) action, 3) observation, and 4) reflection. The population of the research was the students of Amik Medicom. To get the sample, the researcher took one class, it was MI18B. This research applied quantitative and qualitative data. Quantitative method were taken from the students' test. Qualitative data were taken from observation, questionnaires sheet and diary notes. The research found out that there are some improvements of the students’ vocabulary mastery taught by applying real objects. It was proved from the students’ improvement in cycle 1 until cycle 2. The improvement can be seen that in pre test the means score was 34.66. In the first cycle,  meeting 1 the means score was 37,33, in meeting 2 was 47,66 and in meeting 3 was 53,5. In the second cycle, meeting 1 the means score was 68,83,  in meeting 2 was 80,33 and in meeting 3 was 91,66. The improvement also can be seen from the percentage of the students’ achievement in mastering vocabulary; in pre test, no one of the students got 75 points. In the first cycle, in meeting 1, and there no one student got 75 point,  in meeting 3 there was 16.7% (5 students) got 75 points. It means there was an improvement about 16.7 % . In the second cycle, in meeting 1 there was 20% (6 students) got 75 points, it means that there was an improvement about 3.3%. In meeting 2 there was 80% (24 students) got 75 points, it means that there was an improvement about 70%.  In meeting 3 there was 100% (30 students) got up 75 points, it means that there was an improvement about 30%. It means that all of the students got better result. They could master many new vocabulary items and composed them into good sentences. 
通过实物教学提高学生词汇掌握能力
本研究旨在探讨通过实物教学对学生词汇掌握的促进作用。本研究采用课堂行动研究的方法进行。它是通过1)计划、2)行动、3)观察和4)反思完成的。研究对象是阿米克医学院的学生。为了获得样本,研究人员上了一门课,它是MI18B。本研究采用了定量和定性数据。定量方法采用学生测试。定性数据来源于观察、问卷调查和日记记录。研究发现,运用实物教学对学生的词汇掌握有一定的促进作用。从学生在第1周期的进步到第2周期的进步都证明了这一点。可以看出,在前测中,平均得分为34.66。在第一个周期中,会议1的平均得分为37,33,会议2的平均得分为47,66,会议3的平均得分为53,5。在第二个周期中,会议1的平均得分为68,83,会议2的平均得分为80,33,会议3的平均得分为91,66。这种提高也可以从学生掌握词汇的成绩百分比中看出;在预测中,没有一个学生得75分。在第一个循环中,在会议1中,没有一个学生得到75分,在会议3中,有16.7%(5名学生)得到75分。这意味着有16.7%的改善。在第二个循环中,在会议1中有20%(6名学生)得到75分,这意味着有大约3.3%的进步。在会议2中,有80%(24名学生)得到75分,这意味着有大约70%的进步。在会议3中,有100%(30名学生)得到了75分,这意味着有大约30%的进步。这意味着所有的学生都取得了更好的成绩。他们能掌握许多新词汇,并把它们编成好句子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信