Explaining CDS Prices Before and After the Lehman Default with a Simple Structural Model

G. Gemmill, Miriam Marra
{"title":"Explaining CDS Prices Before and After the Lehman Default with a Simple Structural Model","authors":"G. Gemmill, Miriam Marra","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2391314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We examine what determines CDS prices over 2005-2012. To do this, we calibrate Merton's model in a novel way that allows for deviations from lognormality. The model works well in cross-section and time-series, both within and out-of sample. It confirms that systematic equity volatility is the major determinant of CDS prices. Before the Lehman default, all firms have CDS prices that are close to those set by the model (with small variations due to illiquidity and earnings-uncertainty). After the default, some firms continue to have CDS prices at model-predicted levels, but others are now more-strongly influenced by idiosyncratic factors and have much higher prices.","PeriodicalId":177064,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Other Econometric Modeling: Derivatives (Topic)","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Other Econometric Modeling: Derivatives (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2391314","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

We examine what determines CDS prices over 2005-2012. To do this, we calibrate Merton's model in a novel way that allows for deviations from lognormality. The model works well in cross-section and time-series, both within and out-of sample. It confirms that systematic equity volatility is the major determinant of CDS prices. Before the Lehman default, all firms have CDS prices that are close to those set by the model (with small variations due to illiquidity and earnings-uncertainty). After the default, some firms continue to have CDS prices at model-predicted levels, but others are now more-strongly influenced by idiosyncratic factors and have much higher prices.
用一个简单的结构模型解释雷曼违约前后CDS价格
我们考察了2005-2012年间决定CDS价格的因素。为了做到这一点,我们以一种允许偏离对数正态性的新方式校准默顿模型。该模型在样本内和样本外的横截面和时间序列上都有良好的效果。它证实了系统性股票波动是CDS价格的主要决定因素。在雷曼破产之前,所有公司的CDS价格都接近于模型设定的价格(由于缺乏流动性和收益不确定性而有微小的变化)。违约后,一些公司的CDS价格继续保持在模型预测的水平,但其他公司现在受到特殊因素的更强烈影响,价格要高得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信