G20 Endorsement in Post Crisis Global Governance: More than a Toothless Talking Shop?

IF 2.1 2区 社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Richard Eccleston, Aynsley Kellow, Peter Carroll
{"title":"G20 Endorsement in Post Crisis Global Governance: More than a Toothless Talking Shop?","authors":"Richard Eccleston,&nbsp;Aynsley Kellow,&nbsp;Peter Carroll","doi":"10.1111/1467-856X.12034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p><i>This article</i></p><ul>\n \n <li>Highlights how G20 ‘endorsement’ promotes and enhances the legitimacy of specialist technical agencies and organisations</li>\n \n <li>Provides a case study highlighting the impact of G20 endorsement on the OECD's international tax transparency agenda</li>\n \n <li>Develops a mid-level theory of G20 endorsement in order to analyse this emerging form of authority in global governance</li>\n </ul>\n <p>The G20 Leaders' Forum has been touted as ‘The world's premier forum for promoting global cooperation’, yet beyond this rhetoric the track record of the G20 is varied leading critics to claim sit is little more than a ‘toothless talkshop’. We argue that such sweeping generalisations are difficult to sustain in the light of evidence from some issue arenas in which the G20 has been active. This article draws on the extant literature on the ‘Gs’ and network governance in an attempt to theorise and explain the G20's endorsement function, or its capacity to promote and legitimise the work of specialised organisations and networks. We build on the extant literature using a semi-inductive method focusing on the G20's endorsement of the OECD's international tax transparency agenda to develop a mid-level framework for analysing this important source of authority in global governance.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51479,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Politics & International Relations","volume":"17 2","pages":"298-317"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/1467-856X.12034","citationCount":"38","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Politics & International Relations","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-856X.12034","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 38

Abstract

This article

  • Highlights how G20 ‘endorsement’ promotes and enhances the legitimacy of specialist technical agencies and organisations
  • Provides a case study highlighting the impact of G20 endorsement on the OECD's international tax transparency agenda
  • Develops a mid-level theory of G20 endorsement in order to analyse this emerging form of authority in global governance

The G20 Leaders' Forum has been touted as ‘The world's premier forum for promoting global cooperation’, yet beyond this rhetoric the track record of the G20 is varied leading critics to claim sit is little more than a ‘toothless talkshop’. We argue that such sweeping generalisations are difficult to sustain in the light of evidence from some issue arenas in which the G20 has been active. This article draws on the extant literature on the ‘Gs’ and network governance in an attempt to theorise and explain the G20's endorsement function, or its capacity to promote and legitimise the work of specialised organisations and networks. We build on the extant literature using a semi-inductive method focusing on the G20's endorsement of the OECD's international tax transparency agenda to develop a mid-level framework for analysing this important source of authority in global governance.

二十国集团支持后危机时代的全球治理:不仅仅是一个没有实权的清谈馆?
本文重点介绍了G20“认可”如何促进和提高专业技术机构和组织的合法性,提供了一个案例研究,突出了G20认可对经合组织国际税收透明度议程的影响。发展了G20认可的中级理论,以分析这种新兴的全球治理权威形式作为“促进全球合作的全球首要论坛”,然而,在这一修辞之外,G20的记录五花八门,导致批评者声称它只不过是一个“没有牙的清谈会”。我们认为,鉴于G20一直积极参与的一些问题领域的证据,这种笼统的概括很难站得住脚。本文借鉴了关于“g”和网络治理的现有文献,试图理论化和解释G20的认可功能,或其促进专业组织和网络工作并使其合法化的能力。我们在现有文献的基础上,采用半归纳方法,重点关注G20对经合组织国际税收透明度议程的认可,以建立一个中级框架,用于分析这一重要的全球治理权威来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: BJPIR provides an outlet for the best of British political science and of political science on Britain Founded in 1999, BJPIR is now based in the School of Politics at the University of Nottingham. It is a major refereed journal published by Blackwell Publishing under the auspices of the Political Studies Association of the United Kingdom. BJPIR is committed to acting as a broadly-based outlet for the best of British political science and of political science on Britain. A fully refereed journal, it publishes topical, scholarly work on significant debates in British scholarship and on all major political issues affecting Britain"s relationship to Europe and the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信