Leadership Talk by the AJC Director of International Jewish Affairs; Personal Representative of the OSCE Chairperson-in-Office on Combating Anti-Semitism

Andrew Baker
{"title":"Leadership Talk by the AJC Director of International Jewish Affairs; Personal Representative of the OSCE Chairperson-in-Office on Combating Anti-Semitism","authors":"Andrew Baker","doi":"10.1515/9783110618594-010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fifteen years have passed since the OSCE held its first conference on antisemitism in June 2003, here in Vienna. It addressed specific matters relevant to antisemitism, including the importance of understanding and defining it, the need for education about Judaism and the Jewish community, and the value of promoting Holocaust education and remembrance. But the conference also spoke in general and comprehensive ways by offering recommendations. It underscored the obligation for governments to identify and monitor hate crimes, the need to train police and prosecutors, and the need to teach students about religion and religious communities generally. In that pre-social media era, the conference flagged concerns about the spread of hate on the internet and the responsibility of traditional media to avoid promoting intolerance.1 It offered the OSCE as a place for governments to share best practices and to prod its participating States to do more. Before the conference had come to an end, the German delegation stood up to propose that it host a follow-up conference in Berlin the following year. That conference and the Berlin Declaration that resulted from it were a milestone in efforts by the OSCE to tackle the problem of antisemitism. In carefully worded language, the conference began a process of defining antisemitism as it relates to Israel. The declaration spoke of antisemitism taking on “new forms and expressions,”2 and it made clear that incidents in Israel and the Middle East could never justify antisemitic attacks. It spelled out commitments for participating States and for the OSCE’s Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR), including identifying","PeriodicalId":418945,"journal":{"name":"Comprehending and Confronting Antisemitism","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comprehending and Confronting Antisemitism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110618594-010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fifteen years have passed since the OSCE held its first conference on antisemitism in June 2003, here in Vienna. It addressed specific matters relevant to antisemitism, including the importance of understanding and defining it, the need for education about Judaism and the Jewish community, and the value of promoting Holocaust education and remembrance. But the conference also spoke in general and comprehensive ways by offering recommendations. It underscored the obligation for governments to identify and monitor hate crimes, the need to train police and prosecutors, and the need to teach students about religion and religious communities generally. In that pre-social media era, the conference flagged concerns about the spread of hate on the internet and the responsibility of traditional media to avoid promoting intolerance.1 It offered the OSCE as a place for governments to share best practices and to prod its participating States to do more. Before the conference had come to an end, the German delegation stood up to propose that it host a follow-up conference in Berlin the following year. That conference and the Berlin Declaration that resulted from it were a milestone in efforts by the OSCE to tackle the problem of antisemitism. In carefully worded language, the conference began a process of defining antisemitism as it relates to Israel. The declaration spoke of antisemitism taking on “new forms and expressions,”2 and it made clear that incidents in Israel and the Middle East could never justify antisemitic attacks. It spelled out commitments for participating States and for the OSCE’s Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR), including identifying
AJC国际犹太人事务主任的领导演讲;欧安组织打击反犹太主义问题当值主席个人代表
自从欧安组织于2003年6月在维也纳召开第一次反犹太主义会议以来,已经过去了15年。会议讨论了与反犹主义有关的具体事项,包括理解和界定反犹主义的重要性、开展关于犹太教和犹太社区教育的必要性,以及促进大屠杀教育和纪念的价值。但会议也通过提出建议,以一般性和综合性的方式发言。报告强调,各国政府有义务查明和监测仇恨犯罪,有必要培训警察和检察官,有必要向学生普及宗教和宗教社区知识。在那个前社交媒体时代,会议对互联网上仇恨的传播以及传统媒体避免促进不容忍的责任表示担忧它使欧安组织成为各国政府分享最佳做法和促使其参与国作出更多努力的场所。在会议结束之前,德国代表团站起来提议,它将于次年在柏林主办一次后续会议。那次会议及其产生的《柏林宣言》是欧安组织努力解决反犹太主义问题的一个里程碑。会议措辞谨慎,开始了界定与以色列有关的反犹太主义的进程。宣言提到反犹主义采取了“新的形式和表现”,并明确表示,以色列和中东的事件永远不能成为反犹主义袭击的理由。它阐明了与会国和欧安组织民主体制和人权办公室的承诺,包括确定
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信