Epilogue

J. Bartelson
{"title":"Epilogue","authors":"J. Bartelson","doi":"10.7591/cornell/9781501755736.003.0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This epilogue suggests that the desire for sovereign agency and recognition are by no means innocent aspirations, since the quest for sovereign agency often tends to circumscribe the autonomy of other actors thereby making it difficult to sustain equality among them. Indeed, the desire for sovereign agency and corresponding quest for recognition are not only prone to backfire on their own terms but also run the risk of perpetuating the same practices of misrecognition and forms of domination that they were designated to escape in the first place. This paradox has recently gained traction among students of international relations, who have argued that world politics is based on a desire for sovereign agency that is bound to produce misrecognition precisely out of the many frustrated attempts to attain international recognition. Those actors who want to assert their sovereign agency are faced with the challenge of navigating the narrow space between nonrecognition and misrecognition in order to preserve a modicum of autonomy in the midst of rival claims to sovereign agency. The chapter then considers how this dilemma plays itself out in the different international and domestic contexts described by the contributors to this book.","PeriodicalId":384140,"journal":{"name":"The Everyday Lives of Sovereignty","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Everyday Lives of Sovereignty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501755736.003.0012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This epilogue suggests that the desire for sovereign agency and recognition are by no means innocent aspirations, since the quest for sovereign agency often tends to circumscribe the autonomy of other actors thereby making it difficult to sustain equality among them. Indeed, the desire for sovereign agency and corresponding quest for recognition are not only prone to backfire on their own terms but also run the risk of perpetuating the same practices of misrecognition and forms of domination that they were designated to escape in the first place. This paradox has recently gained traction among students of international relations, who have argued that world politics is based on a desire for sovereign agency that is bound to produce misrecognition precisely out of the many frustrated attempts to attain international recognition. Those actors who want to assert their sovereign agency are faced with the challenge of navigating the narrow space between nonrecognition and misrecognition in order to preserve a modicum of autonomy in the midst of rival claims to sovereign agency. The chapter then considers how this dilemma plays itself out in the different international and domestic contexts described by the contributors to this book.
后记
这篇结语表明,对主权机构和承认的渴望绝不是无辜的愿望,因为对主权机构的追求往往会限制其他行动者的自主权,从而使它们之间难以维持平等。事实上,对主权机构的渴望和相应的对承认的追求不仅容易事与愿违,而且有可能使误认的做法和统治形式永久化,而这些做法和形式是他们最初被指定要逃避的。这一悖论最近在国际关系专业的学生中引起了关注,他们认为,世界政治是建立在对主权机构的渴望之上的,这种渴望必然会产生误解,而恰恰是由于许多获得国际承认的失败尝试。那些想要主张其主权机构的行为者面临着在不承认和错误承认之间的狭窄空间中导航的挑战,以便在对主权机构的竞争性主张中保留一点自主权。然后,本章考虑了这一困境是如何在本书作者所描述的不同国际和国内背景下发挥作用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信