EURASIAN APPROACHES TO DOMESTIC HISTORIOGRAPHY XIX–XX CENTURIES (IN THE CONTEXT OF INTERPRETATION AND TEACHING THE HISTORY OF RUSSIA)

A. A. Gafarov, Р.А. Набиев, A. Sattarova, M. A. Galeeva
{"title":"EURASIAN APPROACHES TO DOMESTIC HISTORIOGRAPHY XIX–XX CENTURIES (IN THE CONTEXT OF INTERPRETATION AND TEACHING THE HISTORY OF RUSSIA)","authors":"A. A. Gafarov, Р.А. Набиев, A. Sattarova, M. A. Galeeva","doi":"10.17513/spno.29956","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The renewal and revival of Russia on the basis of federalist principles, the search for a modern consolidating idea of Russian society are objectively associated with the tasks of overcoming the rudiments of imperial, western-oriented Russian historiography, as well as the corresponding traditions of teaching Russian history. The theoretical legacy of the «Eurasian historical school» can play an important role in solving these pressing problems. The purpose of this article was an attempt to identify and characterize a complex of Eurasian approaches in interpreting the main plots of Russian history. Based on the historiographic analysis of Eurasian scientific literature (the works of N.S. Trubetskoy, G.V. Vernadsky, P.N. Savitsky, L.N. Gumilyov et al., as well as their predecessors), the authors came to the conclusion that the theoretical The preconditions of Eurasianism, which took Russian historiography beyond the framework of the established Westernist tradition, developed in the second half of the 19th century on the basis of the continuity of development of Russian historical thought. The Eurasian school, considering Russia as a separate civilization, tried to present new, more adequate, organic foundations of the consolidation of multinational Russian society. The main provisions of the Eurasian doctrine, demanded in the course of a deeper and more diverse understanding of the historical past of Russia, educational and educational activities, can become an important factor in the formation of ideas about modern Russian identity.","PeriodicalId":167342,"journal":{"name":"Современные проблемы науки и образования (Modern Problems of Science and Education)","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Современные проблемы науки и образования (Modern Problems of Science and Education)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17513/spno.29956","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The renewal and revival of Russia on the basis of federalist principles, the search for a modern consolidating idea of Russian society are objectively associated with the tasks of overcoming the rudiments of imperial, western-oriented Russian historiography, as well as the corresponding traditions of teaching Russian history. The theoretical legacy of the «Eurasian historical school» can play an important role in solving these pressing problems. The purpose of this article was an attempt to identify and characterize a complex of Eurasian approaches in interpreting the main plots of Russian history. Based on the historiographic analysis of Eurasian scientific literature (the works of N.S. Trubetskoy, G.V. Vernadsky, P.N. Savitsky, L.N. Gumilyov et al., as well as their predecessors), the authors came to the conclusion that the theoretical The preconditions of Eurasianism, which took Russian historiography beyond the framework of the established Westernist tradition, developed in the second half of the 19th century on the basis of the continuity of development of Russian historical thought. The Eurasian school, considering Russia as a separate civilization, tried to present new, more adequate, organic foundations of the consolidation of multinational Russian society. The main provisions of the Eurasian doctrine, demanded in the course of a deeper and more diverse understanding of the historical past of Russia, educational and educational activities, can become an important factor in the formation of ideas about modern Russian identity.
十九至二十世纪国内史学的欧亚方法(在解释和教授俄罗斯历史的背景下)
在联邦主义原则的基础上,俄罗斯的复兴和复兴,寻求俄罗斯社会的现代巩固理念,客观上与克服帝国主义的、以西方为导向的俄罗斯史学的基本原理以及相应的俄罗斯历史教学传统的任务有关。“欧亚历史学派”的理论遗产可以在解决这些紧迫问题方面发挥重要作用。本文的目的是试图在解释俄罗斯历史的主要情节时识别和描述欧亚方法的复杂性。基于对欧亚科学文献(N.S. trubetsky、G.V. Vernadsky、P.N. Savitsky、L.N. Gumilyov等人及其前辈的著作)的史学分析,作者得出结论:欧亚主义的理论前提是在19世纪下半叶俄罗斯历史思想发展的连续性基础上发展起来的,它使俄罗斯史学超越了既定的西方传统的框架。欧亚学派认为俄国是一个独立的文明,试图提出新的、更充分的、有机的基础来巩固多民族的俄国社会。欧亚主义的主要条款是在对俄罗斯历史、教育和教育活动进行更深入和更多样化的理解的过程中所要求的,可以成为形成现代俄罗斯认同观念的重要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信