{"title":"Low-leakage repeaters for NoC interconnects","authors":"A. Morgenshtein, I. Cidon, R. Ginosar, A. Kolodny","doi":"10.1109/ISCAS.2005.1464659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several low-leakage repeater circuits for network-on-chip (NoC) interconnects are presented and analyzed for various utilization rates. The recently proposed staggered-Vt (SVT) repeater is compared with the novel dual-Vt domino (DTD) repeaters and sleep repeaters (SR). These circuits are compared with standard low-Vt (LVT) repeaters in a 32-bit link. Up to 70% and 61% power reduction was obtained in SVT and DTD repeaters, respectively. DTD repeaters are the most area-efficient ones, showing 40% reduction in total area of repeaters. Sleep repeaters are most area-consuming and less effective in high and moderate utilization rates, but comparable to SVT in terms of power for utilization rates below 2%, showing 72% power reduction.","PeriodicalId":191200,"journal":{"name":"2005 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2005 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCAS.2005.1464659","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17
Abstract
Several low-leakage repeater circuits for network-on-chip (NoC) interconnects are presented and analyzed for various utilization rates. The recently proposed staggered-Vt (SVT) repeater is compared with the novel dual-Vt domino (DTD) repeaters and sleep repeaters (SR). These circuits are compared with standard low-Vt (LVT) repeaters in a 32-bit link. Up to 70% and 61% power reduction was obtained in SVT and DTD repeaters, respectively. DTD repeaters are the most area-efficient ones, showing 40% reduction in total area of repeaters. Sleep repeaters are most area-consuming and less effective in high and moderate utilization rates, but comparable to SVT in terms of power for utilization rates below 2%, showing 72% power reduction.