Perception of students about Team-based learning (TBL) Problem-based learning (PBL)

K. Malik
{"title":"Perception of students about Team-based learning (TBL) Problem-based learning (PBL)","authors":"K. Malik","doi":"10.53708/hpej.v3i1.90","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background: Medical teaching has evolved over the past few years, from traditional teaching methods such as lectures and practical classes using blackboard, slide projector to more student-centered activities such as self-directed learning, problem based learning (PBL) and team-based learning (TBL) Problem based learning is an integral part of our MBBS curriculum. We introduced TBL to 2nd year MBBS students in Pharmacology department, who are also practicing PBL in 2nd year. Aim: The aim of the study was to know student’s perception about TBL and PBL. Methods:  Students were asked to fill the questionnaire regarding each teaching strategy anonymously using both, open and closed ended questions. The data was analyzed by using SPSS version 21. Results: A total of 120 students filled the questionnaire regarding their perception about TBL, and 94 students filled the questionnaire regarding PBL. Students found the readiness assurance tests and immediate feedback effective for their learning in TBL. While for PBL, students found that different point of views were respected by group members and there is better integration among different disciplines in PBL. Conclusion: It is the need of the hour to include new strategies in our curriculum which promotes team work and effective communication skills. Both PBL and TBL have advantages of their own and can provide better student learning if incorporated in a medical curriculum, keeping in view the students responses in our study.","PeriodicalId":338468,"journal":{"name":"Health Professions Educator Journal","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Professions Educator Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53708/hpej.v3i1.90","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background: Medical teaching has evolved over the past few years, from traditional teaching methods such as lectures and practical classes using blackboard, slide projector to more student-centered activities such as self-directed learning, problem based learning (PBL) and team-based learning (TBL) Problem based learning is an integral part of our MBBS curriculum. We introduced TBL to 2nd year MBBS students in Pharmacology department, who are also practicing PBL in 2nd year. Aim: The aim of the study was to know student’s perception about TBL and PBL. Methods:  Students were asked to fill the questionnaire regarding each teaching strategy anonymously using both, open and closed ended questions. The data was analyzed by using SPSS version 21. Results: A total of 120 students filled the questionnaire regarding their perception about TBL, and 94 students filled the questionnaire regarding PBL. Students found the readiness assurance tests and immediate feedback effective for their learning in TBL. While for PBL, students found that different point of views were respected by group members and there is better integration among different disciplines in PBL. Conclusion: It is the need of the hour to include new strategies in our curriculum which promotes team work and effective communication skills. Both PBL and TBL have advantages of their own and can provide better student learning if incorporated in a medical curriculum, keeping in view the students responses in our study.
学生对基于团队学习(TBL)和基于问题学习(PBL)的认知
背景:在过去的几年里,医学教学已经从传统的教学方法,如讲座和使用黑板、幻灯片投影仪的实践课程,发展到更多以学生为中心的活动,如自主学习、基于问题的学习(PBL)和基于团队的学习(TBL)。我们向药学系MBBS二年级的学生介绍了PBL,他们也在二年级实践PBL。目的:了解学生对任务型教学和PBL教学的认知。方法:采用开放式和封闭式两种方式,对各教学策略进行问卷匿名填写。采用SPSS 21版对数据进行分析。结果:共有120名学生填写了关于TBL的问卷,94名学生填写了关于PBL的问卷。学生发现准备保证测试和即时反馈对他们的TBL学习是有效的。而在PBL中,学生发现不同的观点受到小组成员的尊重,不同学科之间的整合更好。结论:我们需要在课程中加入新的策略,以促进团队合作和有效的沟通技巧。PBL和TBL都有各自的优势,如果将其纳入医学课程,可以提供更好的学生学习,同时考虑到我们研究中学生的反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信