Generosity and Wealth: Experimental Evidence from Bogotá Stratification

Mariana Blanco, P. Dalton
{"title":"Generosity and Wealth: Experimental Evidence from Bogotá Stratification","authors":"Mariana Blanco, P. Dalton","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3481022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper combines laboratory experiments with a unique feature of the city of Bogota to uncover the relationship between generosity and wealth. Bogota is divided by law into six socio-economic strata which are close proxies of household wealth and income. We recruit subjects from different strata and run a series of double-blind dictator games where the recipient is the NGO Techo-Colombia, which builds transitional housing for homeless families. We identify the stratum of each subject anonymously and blindly, and match their donations with their stratum. In a first experiment we provide a fixed endowment to all participants and nd that donations are significantly increasing with wealth. However, in a second experiment, we show that this is not because the rich are intrinsically more generous, but because the experimental endowment has lower real value for them. With endowments that are equivalent to their daily expenditures, the rich, the middle-class and the poor give a similar proportion of their stratum-equivalent endowment. Moreover, we find that the motivation to donate is similar across strata, where the generosity act is explained mainly by warm-glow rather than pure altruism.","PeriodicalId":415707,"journal":{"name":"SRPN: Poverty (Topic)","volume":"243 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SRPN: Poverty (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3481022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

This paper combines laboratory experiments with a unique feature of the city of Bogota to uncover the relationship between generosity and wealth. Bogota is divided by law into six socio-economic strata which are close proxies of household wealth and income. We recruit subjects from different strata and run a series of double-blind dictator games where the recipient is the NGO Techo-Colombia, which builds transitional housing for homeless families. We identify the stratum of each subject anonymously and blindly, and match their donations with their stratum. In a first experiment we provide a fixed endowment to all participants and nd that donations are significantly increasing with wealth. However, in a second experiment, we show that this is not because the rich are intrinsically more generous, but because the experimental endowment has lower real value for them. With endowments that are equivalent to their daily expenditures, the rich, the middle-class and the poor give a similar proportion of their stratum-equivalent endowment. Moreover, we find that the motivation to donate is similar across strata, where the generosity act is explained mainly by warm-glow rather than pure altruism.
慷慨与财富:来自波哥大分层的实验证据
本文将实验室实验与波哥大城市的独特特征相结合,揭示慷慨与财富之间的关系。波哥大根据法律分为六个社会经济阶层,这些阶层是家庭财富和收入的密切代表。我们从不同阶层招募受试者,进行一系列双盲独裁者游戏,接受者是非政府组织Techo-Colombia,该组织为无家可归的家庭建造过渡性住房。我们以匿名和盲目的方式识别每个受试者的阶层,并将他们的捐赠与其阶层相匹配。在第一个实验中,我们向所有参与者提供固定的捐赠,并且捐赠随着财富的增加而显著增加。然而,在第二个实验中,我们表明,这并不是因为富人本质上更慷慨,而是因为实验捐赠对他们的实际价值较低。富人、中产阶级和穷人的捐赠相当于他们的日常支出,他们捐赠的比例与他们的阶层相当。此外,我们发现捐赠的动机在各个阶层都是相似的,在这些阶层中,慷慨行为主要是由温暖的光芒而不是纯粹的利他主义来解释的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信