Life cycle assessment of Bitcoin mining in the top ten miner countries

Rahimov M. Zahedi, A. Aslani, Mohammad Ali Nasle Seraji
{"title":"Life cycle assessment of Bitcoin mining in the top ten miner countries","authors":"Rahimov M. Zahedi, A. Aslani, Mohammad Ali Nasle Seraji","doi":"10.18282/i-es.v6i1.583","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An unprecedented emergence has occurred for the cryptocurrencies among enterprises, customers, and investors as a result of the growing number of internet connections worldwide. The most popular cryptocurrency is Bitcoin representing the rise of digital payment systems. Though, harsh criticism has been also created for cryptocurrencies about their environmental sustainability and power consumption, decelerating the acceptance of bitcoin by consumer as a means of payment. The ecological impact or footprint of a process is determined mainly through life-cycle-assessment (LCA) quantifying all material flows’ inputs and outputs for a process or product and their effect on the environment. This study provides LCA-based framework to show the environmental impacts of Bitcoin mining from top ten miner countries (China, USA, Kazakhstan, Russia, Iran, Malaysia, Canada, Germany, Ireland, Norway). The results show that with the share of 53.3% of the world’s mining, China has the most negative environmental impact specially in marine ecotoxicity with 26.8 kg 1,4-DCB and human health with 0.0043 DALY but with the equal mining ratio Germany and Kazakhstan have the most negative environmental impacts.","PeriodicalId":261040,"journal":{"name":"Insight - Energy Science","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insight - Energy Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18282/i-es.v6i1.583","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An unprecedented emergence has occurred for the cryptocurrencies among enterprises, customers, and investors as a result of the growing number of internet connections worldwide. The most popular cryptocurrency is Bitcoin representing the rise of digital payment systems. Though, harsh criticism has been also created for cryptocurrencies about their environmental sustainability and power consumption, decelerating the acceptance of bitcoin by consumer as a means of payment. The ecological impact or footprint of a process is determined mainly through life-cycle-assessment (LCA) quantifying all material flows’ inputs and outputs for a process or product and their effect on the environment. This study provides LCA-based framework to show the environmental impacts of Bitcoin mining from top ten miner countries (China, USA, Kazakhstan, Russia, Iran, Malaysia, Canada, Germany, Ireland, Norway). The results show that with the share of 53.3% of the world’s mining, China has the most negative environmental impact specially in marine ecotoxicity with 26.8 kg 1,4-DCB and human health with 0.0043 DALY but with the equal mining ratio Germany and Kazakhstan have the most negative environmental impacts.
十大矿国比特币挖矿的生命周期评估
由于全球互联网连接数量的增加,加密货币在企业、客户和投资者中出现了前所未有的出现。最受欢迎的加密货币是代表数字支付系统兴起的比特币。然而,人们也对加密货币的环境可持续性和电力消耗提出了严厉的批评,这减缓了消费者对比特币作为支付手段的接受程度。一个过程的生态影响或足迹主要是通过生命周期评估(LCA)来确定的,它量化了一个过程或产品的所有物质流的输入和输出及其对环境的影响。本研究提供了基于lca的框架,以显示来自十大矿国(中国、美国、哈萨克斯坦、俄罗斯、伊朗、马来西亚、加拿大、德国、爱尔兰、挪威)的比特币开采对环境的影响。结果表明,中国占世界采矿业的53.3%,对环境的负面影响最大,特别是海洋生态毒性为26.8 kg,人类健康为0.0043 DALY,而在相同的采矿业比例下,德国和哈萨克斯坦的负面环境影响最大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信