Cultural Nationalism, Westward Expansion and the Production of Imperial Landscape: George Catlin’s Native American West

G. E. John
{"title":"Cultural Nationalism, Westward Expansion and the Production of Imperial Landscape: George Catlin’s Native American West","authors":"G. E. John","doi":"10.1177/096746080100800203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper I approach artist George Catlin’s landscape paintings and descriptions of 1830s Native America as a constituent component of an ambivalent imperialist iconography that depicted American westward expansion and Indian policy during the first half of the nineteenth century. Drawing upon iconological theory, I explore the multiple and often conflicting meanings encoded in Catlin’s work to show how his descriptions and images of the northern plains asserted his vision of the western landscape as Indian country, projecting a naturalistic, ‘scientific’ and purportedly authentic view of what was perceived as a rapidly fading scene. Although he claimed for his art an authenticity and naturalism drawn directly from nature, Catlin was profoundly influenced by a set of artistic and literary conventions propounded by those arguing for a distinctive national culture. Indeed, the American landscape and the Indian were symbols linking textually and aesthetically the natural environment and its aboriginal people to romantic notions of morality, exceptionality, and a national racial heritage. But while celebrating and promoting the Indian subject, nationalists painted a spectral picture of the Indians’ future complicit with Jacksonian policy designed to rid eastern lands of Native Americans. Catlin’s landscape paintings and descriptions problematically reproduced this irreconcilable tension in early nineteenth-century cultural nationalism and ultimately contributed to an imperial discourse on the Native American West: one that in Catlin’s works ambivalently contained its own critique, questioning the effects of westward expansion and Indian policy.","PeriodicalId":104830,"journal":{"name":"Ecumene (continues as Cultural Geographies)","volume":"161 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecumene (continues as Cultural Geographies)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/096746080100800203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

In this paper I approach artist George Catlin’s landscape paintings and descriptions of 1830s Native America as a constituent component of an ambivalent imperialist iconography that depicted American westward expansion and Indian policy during the first half of the nineteenth century. Drawing upon iconological theory, I explore the multiple and often conflicting meanings encoded in Catlin’s work to show how his descriptions and images of the northern plains asserted his vision of the western landscape as Indian country, projecting a naturalistic, ‘scientific’ and purportedly authentic view of what was perceived as a rapidly fading scene. Although he claimed for his art an authenticity and naturalism drawn directly from nature, Catlin was profoundly influenced by a set of artistic and literary conventions propounded by those arguing for a distinctive national culture. Indeed, the American landscape and the Indian were symbols linking textually and aesthetically the natural environment and its aboriginal people to romantic notions of morality, exceptionality, and a national racial heritage. But while celebrating and promoting the Indian subject, nationalists painted a spectral picture of the Indians’ future complicit with Jacksonian policy designed to rid eastern lands of Native Americans. Catlin’s landscape paintings and descriptions problematically reproduced this irreconcilable tension in early nineteenth-century cultural nationalism and ultimately contributed to an imperial discourse on the Native American West: one that in Catlin’s works ambivalently contained its own critique, questioning the effects of westward expansion and Indian policy.
文化民族主义、向西扩张与帝国景观的生产:乔治·卡特林的美国西部原住民
在本文中,我将艺术家乔治·卡特林(George Catlin)的风景画和对19世纪30年代美洲原住民的描述作为一种矛盾的帝国主义图像学的组成部分,这种图像学描绘了19世纪上半叶美国向西扩张和印第安政策。根据图像学理论,我探索了卡特林作品中多重且经常相互冲突的含义,以展示他对北部平原的描述和图像如何断言他对西部景观作为印度国家的看法,投射出一种自然主义的,“科学”的,据称是真实的观点,被认为是一个迅速消退的场景。尽管他声称他的艺术是一种直接从自然中汲取的真实性和自然主义,但卡特林深受那些主张独特民族文化的人所提出的一套艺术和文学惯例的影响。事实上,美国的风景和印第安人是将自然环境和土著居民与浪漫的道德观念、卓越性和民族种族遗产在文本和美学上联系起来的象征。但是,在庆祝和宣传印第安主题的同时,民族主义者描绘了一幅可怕的画面,即印第安人的未来与杰克逊的政策串通一气,旨在清除东部土地上的印第安人。卡特林的风景画和描述有问题地再现了19世纪早期文化民族主义中这种不可调和的紧张关系,并最终促成了对美国西部原住民的帝国话语:在卡特林的作品中,这种话语矛盾地包含了自己的批评,质疑西进扩张和印第安政策的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信