Who is “The Child”? Best Interests and Individuality of Children in Discretionary Decision-Making

J. Krutzinna
{"title":"Who is “The Child”? Best Interests and Individuality of Children in Discretionary Decision-Making","authors":"J. Krutzinna","doi":"10.1163/15718182-30010005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nWhile the substantiation of “best interests” has received much attention, the question of how “the child” is conceptualised to ensure any action taken or decision made is in the particular child’s best interests has been largely neglected. In this paper, I argue that the lack of robust understanding of who “the child” is, means that we continue to make many generalisations and category-based assumptions in determining the child’s best interests. In addressing the challenge of doing right by the individual child, I propose a three-step approach based on a theoretical model of the child that avoids presumptions about child-typical needs and insists on an assessment of the child’s individual characteristics, needs, qualities and circumstances, making it the only conceptualisation fully meeting the child centrism criterion required by children’s rights as determined by the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child.","PeriodicalId":217193,"journal":{"name":"The International Journal of Children’s Rights","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Journal of Children’s Rights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718182-30010005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

While the substantiation of “best interests” has received much attention, the question of how “the child” is conceptualised to ensure any action taken or decision made is in the particular child’s best interests has been largely neglected. In this paper, I argue that the lack of robust understanding of who “the child” is, means that we continue to make many generalisations and category-based assumptions in determining the child’s best interests. In addressing the challenge of doing right by the individual child, I propose a three-step approach based on a theoretical model of the child that avoids presumptions about child-typical needs and insists on an assessment of the child’s individual characteristics, needs, qualities and circumstances, making it the only conceptualisation fully meeting the child centrism criterion required by children’s rights as determined by the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child.
“孩子”是谁?自由裁量决策中儿童的最大利益与个性
虽然“最大利益”的实质得到了很多关注,但如何对“儿童”进行概念化,以确保所采取的任何行动或作出的任何决定都符合特定儿童的最大利益,这个问题在很大程度上被忽视了。在本文中,我认为,缺乏对“孩子”是谁的强有力理解,意味着我们在确定孩子的最大利益时,继续做出许多概括和基于类别的假设。在解决儿童个体正确行事的挑战时,我提出了一种基于儿童理论模型的三步方法,该模型避免了对儿童典型需求的假设,并坚持对儿童的个体特征、需求、品质和环境进行评估,使其成为唯一完全符合《联合国儿童权利公约》所确定的儿童权利所要求的以儿童为中心的标准的概念化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信