Comparison of different DC motor positioning control algorithms

Nikola Bacac, Vedran Slukic, Miroslav Puskaric, B. Stih, E. Kamenar, S. Zelenika
{"title":"Comparison of different DC motor positioning control algorithms","authors":"Nikola Bacac, Vedran Slukic, Miroslav Puskaric, B. Stih, E. Kamenar, S. Zelenika","doi":"10.1109/MIPRO.2014.6859832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A comparison between different DC motor positioning control algorithms is performed in this work. Transient responses while employing a PID controller, a cascade controller and a state-space controller are considered. LabVIEW programming environment with a suitable acquisition card and a miniature DC motor with an integrated encoder are used for experimental assessment. Calculations and control system simulations are made using Matlab. The PID controller is implemented via the predefined PID block in LabVIEW. In turn, the state-space controller is modelled by using Matlab while the accuracy of the results is confirmed experimentally using LabVIEW. The cascade controller is developed as a series of two Proportional-Integral (PI) controllers, one representing the positioning and the other the velocity loop. The obtained results allow establishing that positioning control via the state-space controller has the fastest response and the lowest settling times.","PeriodicalId":299409,"journal":{"name":"2014 37th International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO)","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 37th International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MIPRO.2014.6859832","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

A comparison between different DC motor positioning control algorithms is performed in this work. Transient responses while employing a PID controller, a cascade controller and a state-space controller are considered. LabVIEW programming environment with a suitable acquisition card and a miniature DC motor with an integrated encoder are used for experimental assessment. Calculations and control system simulations are made using Matlab. The PID controller is implemented via the predefined PID block in LabVIEW. In turn, the state-space controller is modelled by using Matlab while the accuracy of the results is confirmed experimentally using LabVIEW. The cascade controller is developed as a series of two Proportional-Integral (PI) controllers, one representing the positioning and the other the velocity loop. The obtained results allow establishing that positioning control via the state-space controller has the fastest response and the lowest settling times.
不同直流电动机定位控制算法的比较
本文对不同的直流电动机定位控制算法进行了比较。在采用PID控制器、级联控制器和状态空间控制器时,考虑了瞬态响应。采用LabVIEW编程环境,配以合适的采集卡和集成编码器的微型直流电机进行实验评估。利用Matlab进行了计算和控制系统仿真。PID控制器是通过LabVIEW中预定义的PID块实现的。利用Matlab对状态空间控制器进行了建模,并利用LabVIEW进行了实验验证。串级控制器由两个比例积分(PI)控制器组成,一个代表定位回路,另一个代表速度回路。得到的结果表明,通过状态空间控制器进行定位控制具有最快的响应速度和最短的定位时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信