Influence of government and market on the relationship between institutional change and Chinese total factor productivity

Qiang Li, Nan Gao
{"title":"Influence of government and market on the relationship between institutional change and Chinese total factor productivity","authors":"Qiang Li, Nan Gao","doi":"10.1109/IEIS.2016.7551858","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chinese economists always pay much attention on how to improve Chinese total factor productivity and make it to be driving factor of Chinese economic growth. Based on the provincial panel data from 1997 to 2011 of 29 provinces (cities, districts) in China, here, we did empirical research on the effects of mandatory institutional change and induced institutional change on Chinese total factor productivity. The induced institutional change and mandatory institutional change was represented by the China marketization index which was proposed by the Fan et al. and preferential policy index, respectively. The results show that the influence of the institutional change on Chinese total factor productivity is heterogeneity. Mandatory institutional change has significant positive effects on Chinese total factor productivity, while induced institutional change has negative effects. These findings indicated that mandatory institutional change dominated by the government is an important reason to promote Chinese total factor productivity, which means the government plays an important part in the process of institutional change. Our study has important implication on how to properly handle the relationship between government (“visible hand”) and market (“invisible hand”) under the new normal and how to coordinate the relationship between the decisive role of market in the allocation of resources and the role of government on economic growth.","PeriodicalId":334364,"journal":{"name":"2016 International Conference on Industrial Economics System and Industrial Security Engineering (IEIS)","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 International Conference on Industrial Economics System and Industrial Security Engineering (IEIS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEIS.2016.7551858","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Chinese economists always pay much attention on how to improve Chinese total factor productivity and make it to be driving factor of Chinese economic growth. Based on the provincial panel data from 1997 to 2011 of 29 provinces (cities, districts) in China, here, we did empirical research on the effects of mandatory institutional change and induced institutional change on Chinese total factor productivity. The induced institutional change and mandatory institutional change was represented by the China marketization index which was proposed by the Fan et al. and preferential policy index, respectively. The results show that the influence of the institutional change on Chinese total factor productivity is heterogeneity. Mandatory institutional change has significant positive effects on Chinese total factor productivity, while induced institutional change has negative effects. These findings indicated that mandatory institutional change dominated by the government is an important reason to promote Chinese total factor productivity, which means the government plays an important part in the process of institutional change. Our study has important implication on how to properly handle the relationship between government (“visible hand”) and market (“invisible hand”) under the new normal and how to coordinate the relationship between the decisive role of market in the allocation of resources and the role of government on economic growth.
政府和市场对制度变迁与中国全要素生产率关系的影响
如何提高中国全要素生产率,使其成为中国经济增长的驱动因素,一直是中国经济学家关注的问题。本文基于1997 - 2011年中国29个省(市、区)的省级面板数据,实证研究了强制性制度变迁和诱导性制度变迁对中国全要素生产率的影响。诱导性制度变迁和强制性制度变迁分别用范等人提出的中国市场化指数和优惠政策指数来表示。研究结果表明,制度变迁对中国全要素生产率的影响具有异质性。强制性制度变迁对全要素生产率有显著的正向影响,诱导性制度变迁对全要素生产率有显著的负向影响。研究结果表明,政府主导的强制性制度变迁是中国全要素生产率提升的重要原因,即政府在制度变迁过程中发挥了重要作用。本文的研究对于新常态下如何正确处理政府(“看得见的手”)与市场(“看不见的手”)的关系,以及如何协调市场在资源配置中的决定性作用与政府在经济增长中的作用之间的关系具有重要的启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信